unbreakable knot

Ryley 2022-03-19 08:01:02

The most common comment I see about the film is, "I used to love Atom Egoyan's films, but this one was a big disappointment." Usually in reference to the film's political orientation. But after I watched it, I couldn't see the problem they were talking about. All I could say was that they were blinded by their political orientation and couldn't see what the director wanted to bring out.

This film wants to deal with a big historical issue: the ethnic cleansing of the Armenians by the Turks in 1915, how the two ethnic groups coexist and how to face history after the events have changed.

I believe that every Chinese who sees this film will feel that the contradictions between the two sides in the film seem familiar, and we feel the same way as the Armenians. Yes, we all think of the Japanese invasion of China and the Nanjing Massacre. Human problems have commonalities, and the attitude of the Turks to the massacre in the film is exactly the attitude that the Japanese often have.

The aggressor claimed that they had never read such history when they were growing up. They doubted the authenticity of the other party's claim, but they would not deny it. They believed that the past should not be mentioned again, and the future is more important. The invaded side, occupied by hatred, vowed that the world would know the justice of history.

The film is to describe an Armenian-born Hollywood director who wants to make a film about the history of the slaughter and promote the crimes of the Turks to the world.

As Atom Egoyan is of Armenian descent, viewers may feel that his handling of this historical issue is unfair to the Turks. In fact, metaphors and hints are used many times in the film, telling the truth is unknown, and it is not important on this issue. It is important that both sides convince themselves of how the events happened. Even if the reconciliation is reasonable and necessary, the two sides have created a gap that cannot be bridged due to their own subjective beliefs.

The best part of the movie is the handling of the play within the play. It's like shooting two sets of movies, and they can be turned into one. The play within the play is a Hollywood movie, and there are scenes of thousands of troops and the ideology of Great America. It can be said that it is the director's satire of Hollywood. Unfortunately, many viewers misinterpret this as the director's Great America. doctrine.

From the tension of Hollywood movies, the director can subtly bring the audience back to the reality in the movie, and control the audience's emotions freely, which is really powerful.

http://andrewon.mysinablog.com/index.php?op=ViewArticle&articleId=101351

View more about Ararat reviews

Extended Reading
  • Godfrey 2022-03-27 09:01:21

    Far from touching history.

  • Christelle 2022-03-24 09:03:51

    If you don't know anything about the Armenian Genocide, this kind of restored image is still very popular. As for the exploration of the ontology of the image, Lao Yi is really becoming more and more mediocre..

Ararat quotes

  • Ali, actor playing Jevdet Bey: [as Jevdet Bey, holds up photo] This your mother? She's given you this photograph so that you may remember her. Look at it now. This is the face of a woman who's raised you to feel superior to us. She's taught you that Turks are vengeful and ignorant. That we're blood-thirsty. Now I am going to teach you something. For what is about to happen to you people is your own fault. As much as you talk about your prophet, Jesus Christ, in the depths of your souls you believe in *nothing*, but commerce and money! My streets are overrun with your markets and moneylenders. Your greed has let us to corruption and ruin. Now you yourselves will be ruined.

  • Rouben: Every scene in this film is based on this document.