Short comment can't let go.
The economic foundation determines the superstructure, so it is logically impossible to accept this state of affairs in modern society. Women are prohibited from all kinds of activities, but they are treated with courtesy when they perform well, and upper-class women can also be respected, without racial discrimination, and don't know what kind of world view they want to set. The maids can accuse others in groups for self-protection, but they can also sacrifice themselves to let their friends run away or leave a bite of food for their companions, which is also inconsistent. It would be too ideal to refuse stoning.
The fact that the archbishop of the heroine looks like Dou Sen is also very disgusting.
The pace is too slow to make sense.
Every sex scene is terribly ugly.
I don’t see where feminism is. Didn’t the heroine go on seeing a man? Even if the other person is the eye, he is willing to dedicate himself.
Ask the inexplicable people for help, and there are even more inexplicable people to help her.
It seems that I know it in my mind, but I haven't thought of any way.
Since it is catching fertile women, how can it be mentioned that it is either a slut (adulter) or a gender traitor (lesbian)? Do you force a ride on feminism? The maid had also given birth to a child, and was supposed to be a maid according to the setting.
The heroine didn't know what she was doing from beginning to end, but she did it anyway, and she felt that she had to bear the humiliation and was brave.
I have always had a secret affection for the wife, and the last episode of the method made the affection explode!
View more about The Handmaid's Tale reviews
