Fable of Hollow Extinction

Devante 2021-11-11 08:01:14

Shamaran is experiencing his own catastrophe. He is trying to turn this extinction event into a powerful fable to alert modern people, just like most of the works except for the "Sixth Sense". This thinker who was obsessed with the rules of mysticism was just telling stories for everyone at first, but now he has almost transformed into a persuader who promotes his self-belief.
This thinker once infused "Small Village" with an amazing reflection on civilization, and infused "Water Monster" with an aesthetic conception and speculation about the earth's environment. However, the box office determines that the current situation of a person who is doing art and reasoning is sad, but these two works still leave a minority of fans. At least, Shamaran's beauty in form is very secretive, and it is also powerful in content.

But what about the dormant "Scourge of Extinction"?
This movie resembles all kinds of mysterious events recorded by science and education channels. Unfortunately, those popular science films always have the answer to you in the end, but "The Calamity of Extinction" has no answer, and it completely requires the people to think about it. Not only that, but Shamaran may have been stimulated by the wordy narrative of "Water Monster" and jumped to the other extreme on the contrary. So that the film is mysterious from the character to the theme, I don't know the so-called.

For the design of the character's character, Shamaran has a spectrum. The autistic wife and the reticent child, as the teacher of the protagonist, each have their own characteristics and symbolism. But the strange thing is that these self-talking characters seem to have only Shamaran understand why they appeared in this bizarre extinction event. As far as the audience is concerned, who is willing to take pains to consider the necessary confession that the director does not tell you, such as the protagonist’s wife, regardless of the image or the inside.
The people in the movie seem to belong to patients with social syndrome, and they are very far away from each other. As always, Shamaran exposes the shortcomings of modern civilization, but what is the connection between these people and the disaster? During the entire escape, Shamaran even gave up the necessary handling of the character's depth. Shamaran affirms that he believes that these people will not believe in communication during the disaster, and that a certain degree of irony, criticism, or sympathy is needed for a movie made for the public.
The highest level of alienation is the old lady, who is not afraid of the heavens and the others. The character Shamaran is very hard, but digress. The audience was constrained by the disaster, but they appeared to be such a gangster. Someone shot the same kind with a shotgun in front. Everyone might understand the imbalance of human nature in the disaster, but this old lady is suspected of overcorrecting, and the low-level person did it for what. In fact, the most disgusting thing is that the formalism of husband and wife usually sublimates love in the virus. Fearlessness is not great here, but is full of unreliable stupidity.

The emptiness of the role makes the film more like a science and education film, and those weird and bizarre creativity emphasize this feeling even more. The longing for the film starts with the damn trailer, in other words, once you have seen the trailer, you don’t have to watch the movie at all. Although this sincere warning is vicious, it has enough integrity. Because this time, Shamaran didn't even explain his creativity.
All the people walking on the main road committed suicide inexplicably, and a gust of wind blowing over the roadside plants was an invisible and powerful weapon of extinction. This idea, through the powerful description of modern movies, can be said to be true and credible, and absolutely terrifying. Accompanying the characters to escape, they understand how to escape, and learn the way of thinking of scientists by the way, but the others are better than nothing. This is the actual look and feel of the film, super simple.
At the end, it seemed as if the cloudy weather was about to turn into a storm, and a greater extinction was about to come. However, what exactly is this disaster? Shamaran was too brave this time, and he took it for granted that he designed a magical fantasy. This is different from the well-known wheat field strange phenomenon. It is not recognized by everyone, but is an exclusive creation. However, Shamaran is still conceptualized according to the theory of mysticism, that is, there is no solution as usual. This time, Shamaran made the mysticism philosophy compiled by herself completely mysterious, and she has also become a perceptual mystic.

Why plants eat humans back, Shamaran said behind the scenes, this is very mysterious, and you need to think about it yourself. This is the consistent style of mystics. According to the custom of this theory, human beings must have suffered and suffered retribution. Therefore, Shamaran’s wary ambitions are hidden in "The Disaster of Extinction". In any case, he wants to use the public's fears and worries to promote his own thoughts and theories through mysterious and supernatural phenomena. He is doing what philosophers, scientists, and theologians do.
Humans living in groups cannot be alienated, nature cannot continue to be harmed, and modern society is not paying attention to these major issues. Err's reasoning is progressive. But Shamaran chose extreme creative grandstanding, obviously just a sensitive person who can see the problem but has no ability to solve the problem, nothing more. He wanted to make "The Disaster of Extinction" a modern fable, but he didn't have the knowledge, mind and connotation of the fabler. It may only be sympathetic to say that people who believe in mysticism are really just good at mystery.
Sorry for Shamaran, he worked very hard, but it turned out to be like this.

View more about The Happening reviews

Extended Reading

The Happening quotes

  • Elliot Moore: The event must've ended before we went out today.

  • [last lines]

    French Bicyclist: I should drop my bicycle off at the apartment before I go to work.

    French Bicyclist's Friend: Can you make Nadia's party tonight?

    French Bicyclist: I should drop my bicycle off at the apartment before I go to work.

    [a scream is heard in the background]

    French Bicyclist's Friend: That frightened me.

    French Bicyclist: I should drop my bicycle off.

    French Bicyclist's Friend: What?

    [the friend sees that everyone has stopped walking as the wind blows]

    French Bicyclist's Friend: My god...

    French Bicyclist: My bicycle.