I heard that Gairich is going to film "King Arthur" with Jude Law, and it is still When I was in the magical version, I was very happy, but after seeing the previews of the water skin, it always gave people a strong street look, and when I saw the bitter melon face when he took a photo with the Warner producer at the premiere , I wonder if Warner’s top management intervened in the film too much and was unhappy. But now it seems that after watching the movie, this mood is more like I’ve worked so hard to design and shoot the movie very carefully, expecting the audience to like it, but being poured cold water on the head by the film critics, baby It feels like the work has been degraded to nothing. After all, the last spy movie with a huge investment hit the street, and if it hits the street again this time, the prospects of Gayrich's director are really gloomy.
Back to the feature film, although I don't like the trailer, I see it in the movie of Gayrich and Jude Law. For good reason, I still pre-purchased tickets for the premiere, even if it is bad, I have to watch it all. After I really watched it, I realized that what the critics said was really meaningless. The quality of "King Arthur" is very high. Can anyone do better than Géric? In this era when magic films are on the street, Gerich still took over the hot potato and produced delicious dishes for the audience.
In this movie, Gerich’s personal style is very obvious, short slow-motion acceleration, a large number of flashback shots, all of which are well integrated into the film, especially the use of a large number of short shots to "take over" Asia. Se’s life from childhood to adulthood is absolutely extraordinary. Those who are tired of watching the protagonist grow up from scratch don’t need to worry about this kind of boring narrative method, because Gerich has condensed them all into a few minutes, if your head turns fast enough. , You can find a lot of information in it, and in the remaining time you can contribute more to the important dialogue to advance the plot, of course, there are indispensable battle scenes. The large number of flashbacks commonly complained by film critics is not a problem at all, because the plot time of its flashbacks is very short, and basically happens one after another, even if it is a multi-line narrative at the same time, the rhythm of the film must fly. NS. It’s the first time I saw this Guyrich-style crime film style in a fantasy film. It’s really novel. It only used a short space to visually shape the character of the character, the process of negotiation and implementation of the entire plan, and incidentally. I also filled in the pit I dug before, if it is not very clear... Just treat it as a combination of "Detective Sherlock Holmes" and "The Lord of the Rings" (I didn't intend to use it with "The Lord of the Rings", I don't want to lead the war )
As far as the story is concerned, there is nothing to be picky about. The film condenses so much information. It is suitable for audiences who like to dig, and it is also suitable for popcorn audiences. The plot is self-evident and leaves the tail of the sequel. GG at the box office is probably like "Golden Compass"). In terms of character portraying, thanks to this narrative method, many of the characters’ personalities are quite distinct, including the protagonist who didn’t like it at all. He didn’t feel it at all), and the most impressive part of the supporting role is his father with a child, Bru’s, and the little finger of Binghuo. Almost many people remember what they did. I watched movies here before. I have forgotten who this person is over there, but in "King Arthur", the characters in it are so clear. Of course, the apprentice witch of Merlin is also very impressed. It's just not a good aspect. I don't know why. , I think she is a bit contrary in the movie... Is it a matter of performance or character design? In addition, due to the length of the movie, the emotional portrayal of the villain is still not enough. In terms of combat, the film has both big and small combat styles, and both are presented. Of course, because Gairich is still better at the latter, the latter has a lot more scenes than the former, but the same is very exciting, with long shots. The battle portrayal of, even that sometimes Gerich also likes to let short shots into it...so that it stops before it has a good time. Music, 32 likes! It matches the movie very well. In layman's terms, it is close to the level of "The Matrix 2" (just close). It makes people feel once again whether the music is written for the movie or the camera is edited for the music, but...due to the background music The recognition rate is very high, so it is easy to find that almost every battle piece has been used twice... Isn't the salary of the soundtrack only half paid...
In general, "King Arthur" is a movie that is fully worth the price. Since it does not have an IMAX version, I watched Wanda's high-brightness 3D. The effect is really good, but ordinary 3D needs to be watched in the front row. Great effect (because the screen is small, IMAX usually sits in the middle row), when you look at it, all kinds of things fly towards the lens. As for the comments that other people say that the movie is dark and bright at the time, it is too funny. People have to retreat in the dark for the sake of tactics. Is it possible that you run away from others with integrity during the day? Of course, because of the dark night scene, I bought the ticket for the high-brightness theater. I wanted to buy the laser theater, but the ticket price was moving. In addition, some people may have discovered that I never mentioned the subtitle of this movie. This is purely because I think the person responsible for translating the subtitle or his leader is a brain-dead. They are clearly called "Legend of the Holy Sword", fighting your sister for hegemony! There was a lot of Low in an instant. Anyway, if you like the director of Gerich, this movie is a work you can't miss. He did not disappoint the fans.
Overall rating: 4.4/5.0 (Basically, there are some minor shortcomings, such as the lack of portrayal of the big villain, and the final battle has become a cliché Etc.)
Entertainment Index: 4.0/5.0 (Mage’s method of casting spells is too low-key, not even a magic circle, look at Medivh and Doctor Strange next door, tusk... Besides, the final battle is not fun enough)
Box office performance: Cost 1 75 million yuan is a huge investment. The scarcity of the scenes of the Great War makes people feel that the budget is not known where they are spent, but the production of special effects is quite exquisite. Affected by the bad media reputation, the large-scale opening of 3702 screens in North America in the first week, the box office was only 14.7 million, and even a small-cost film could not compare with it. In China, because there was basically no publicity, the box office in the first week was only 5.21 million, which was lost to low-cost Indian films and hit the streets seriously. With an overseas box office of 29.1 million, the whole world is not waiting to see this movie and bury it in person. What? Said a good six-part King Arthur? nonexistent. It can be seen that the inner beauty of a person is not really important, because people are not interested in knowing you at all, and the value of appearance is justice. Nevertheless, I’m very happy that Gerich can bring such a great work.
The lady in the lake was very excited when she appeared, because the Polish game manufacturer CDPR had portrayed this scene in the "Witcher" generation and paid tribute to King Arthur. When I played at the time, I was very impressed and kept using the silver sword bestowed by the lady in the lake. Finally, even the second generation has been carrying it. I am very happy to see this gorgeous image reappear in the movie, just the sound... I think the
modern costumes and dresses in the movie that should be more moving are indeed a bit of a play. .. It feels like watching a traversal drama, but the director said it was designed deliberately, which is more suitable for modern aesthetics, but...why did everything turn black after Jude Law became king? Is it also a modern aesthetic...
Although I like it very much This movie, but I don’t have much interest in going to the cinema to watch it for the second time. After all, most of the details are written down, and the special effects are also written down. Unlike "Doctor Strange", the screen changes too fast. I want to see the neglected ones again. The special effects details, but anyway, I rarely see the same movie twice
except for the battle. The most impressive thing is that the child Bru broke into the room and talked to the king at the bridge.
Is it the British actor who has better acting skills, or For other reasons, I always feel that the roles in the performance are very dedicated, and the feelings are revealed in the gestures, but Jude Law’s wife and wife are more difficult to act, after all, there is no portrayal, and I still feel that the witch’s performance is a bit hard Too much...
View more about King Arthur: Legend of the Sword reviews
