"Legend of the Holy Sword" can definitely attract more attention. Let me talk about two points. First: The story of King Arthur. Even if King Arthur does not know his story, he also knows that his character, the King of Britain, pulled out of the legendary stone. Swords, etc., if it is placed in the themes of movies, the absolute epic theme is the first choice and the second: epic movies, not to discuss domestic, when it comes to foreign epic movies, what do you think of the first time? "Lord of the Rings" trilogy, "Gladiator", "The Hobbit" trilogy, "Heavenly Kingdom"? Wait, in my limited filming career, foreign epic movies are basically dedicated by the two directors of Peter Jackson and Ridley Scott, and the two Spaniards by Master Kubrick and Zach Schneider. Da did not look at it. So I won’t join the discussion series of general epic movies for the time being. The overall style is serious and even sad. The progress bar makes you want to commit suicide. I am sorry if I don’t hold you on a chair and watch it for more than two and a half hours. Needless to say, the length of each of the Lord of the Rings trilogy is three hours. Gladiator is three hours, and the film is severely unbalanced because of too much cutting. So when you watch it, you should also watch the three-hour version. Then enter the main topic, this film: Without a doubt, if you have watched the guide's "Two Big Smokers" and "Snatch and Snatch", you think our guide will adopt that slow film narrative method. NS? That's weird! No matter how a director shoots different themes in the future, some things in his bones will never change. Let the rock-style cover guide make a serious and sad film, you might as well kill him Guy Ritchie and adopt his own routine. , Broke the style of previous epic films. Using a lot of fast editing and flashback shots, the narrative rhythm is much faster, the soundtrack is rock-like (especially like the soundtrack, listening to the leg is shaking), which should also be mixed with some British humor, although I am not very familiar with this aspect Understand. Let me completely subvert the concept of epic films in the past. Although I am not a fan of guides, I was very cool to watch. The shortcomings are also exposed. The plot is too rushed, and there are several places that can be dealt with quickly. For example, Arthur came out as soon as he entered the dark world. What is not explained in detail at all, and the characters are fascinated. In my opinion, except for Arthur and his uncle, many characters are unrememberable. It is more about remembering this actor than this character, plus The final battle is quite routine. I think it may be difficult for some more professional moviegoers to accept it, and I understand why this film has such a bad reputation for the Rotten Tomatoes, which pays attention to the depth of the plot and the characterization.
This time Gaidao dealt with new wine in an old bottle, and played a new trick.
And for me, the long-shot special effects fight allows me to forget a lot of things. You must know that the first half of "Superman: Man of Steel" has a big story that made me feel broken. It is better to punch in the last few minutes. Leaning people out for several kilometers, the long-shot fight followed happily, I watched the adrenaline surge and the hormones burst. Finally, the five-star movie is no exception. Several fights in this film are extremely brilliant. The long-shot special effects of the final battle, coupled with the striking sense and sound effects between the weapons, make me high again. The previous shortcomings are almost forget. All in all, I am satisfied with the answer sheet this time. If you don’t like it, come and argue with me that this is a bad movie, I can only say that everyone has different experience in watching movies.
View more about King Arthur: Legend of the Sword reviews
