Also meaningless are the pseudo-professional terms reversed, completely nobody cares, but I have to say it over and over again, which is quite noisy, until it is so verbose that it makes people weird. The key issue of "money to buy equipment to make equipment" has finally closed my mouth and just did it.
Because of these messy miscellaneous items, "Super Expendables" also almost fell into the old way of last year's "Pixel Wars"-I don't know whether I should be a special effects action movie or a comedy with all five internal organs. The inaccuracy of the type makes the intro part and the first act of "Super Expendables" extremely chaotic, and the final ending is also a bit boring, only the second and third acts are of higher quality.
Aside from the pure male vase hammer brother, the four heroines have all suffered strong stereotyped attacks on character design. First of all, the two people who became famous are quite inspiring-Melissa McCarthy and Christine Wegg are not motivated, and the characters are completely taken from the previous films and used, and they are seriously lacking in freshness. Sense, and very boring. Leslie Jones has a big problem. This character has the potential to become a street-smart, not just a rude black woman who yells and yells, but the movie is about to go the second way. Begging for nothing. It is true that Leslie Jones’s representative image in SNL is such a self-defeating boss, but in such a sex-turned feminist comedy film, this kind of stereotype should be avoided most.
In "Ghostbusters" in 1984, is the role of Aene Hudson a typical black figure in the 1980s? Do not. On the contrary, he is just an ordinary American man who wants to find a job. This is equality. In contrast to the "Super Expendables" under the banner of feminism, Leslie Jones still needs to play a typical black woman in an almost offensive way. It is a great harm to both the character and the actors themselves. And regress.
View more about Ghostbusters reviews
