I know a lot about international politics . So the movie looks a bit strenuous, and it can’t figure out exactly what the origins of the cocoon names such as Jews, Israel, Arabs, Palestine, etc., not to mention strange names such as Gerhard. It is also because of this, I had to look more carefully. After
more than two hours of watching, the biggest feeling is of course the AVNER as a person and the changes in the heart that occur with the development of the event itself. From firmness to doubt; from doubt to panic; from panic to collapse, just In this way, he fell into an irresistible vortex. In the nostalgic light and shadow, his heart fell along with AVNER. Needless to say, Spielberg’s skillful technique, his thoughts linger along with his influence.
For the loopholes mentioned by netizens, maybe It is the reason why I am not rigorous. I always don’t know what to do, and I don’t have to go into it. No matter how good the movie is, there are loopholes. There are too many "attentive" people, but the director is also a human. Loopholes are objective problems, but they don’t have to be. Negative reasons.
Politics is born of people, but people cannot control politics. Just like AVNER finally thought that killing an organizer would have newcomers, but politics cannot tolerate the arrogance of opponents. People and politics, in the end who controls whom ?
I could not utter the names of several agents when a man was shot glasses female killer, AVNER face of sight, there was a simple string, like indifference third party again questioning people and politics, in the end who is in control Who is it? People are controlled through politics; people are in control.
When people face politics, who is playing the strings...
View more about Munich reviews
