Really underestimated a conscience IP restart soft science fiction masterpiece

Reginald 2022-01-27 08:01:17

The concept of the whole story coincides with the current cyberpunk 2077 scene: technology companies will gradually replace the government, manipulate the media, and become the hegemon of the new world because of technology, money, and people's livelihood dependence. As long as they create a "hero" image that the masses are happy to see, they can become gods.

The Brazilian director José Padilla once directed two episodes of "Elite Force", and later relied on guiding Netflix to shine in the first season of "Drug Lords". His strength in this medium-sized commercial film can be described as all aspects, not only the pattern, rhythm, and conflict of the whole story, but also his intentions in performance and lens language.

In the middle of the story, a scene where Robocop goes home to visit his wife and children for the first time. It uses a soundtrack with music box elements and discordant melodies, and a panoramic shot that uses the extreme height difference between the father and son. After the transformation of the machine, it was separated from the family.

Joel Kinnaman's performance in this film is also very hierarchical. Although this is not a deep character, before he becomes Robocop, the protagonist Alex has two short scenes. The boss confronts the boss in the police station, and he goes home with his wife. Intimacy, in this most common drama that creates Tiehan's tenderness, you can feel the character's distinctive fullness compared to other police detectives of the same kind. If it hadn’t been for this movie, Joel’s image would almost have been stereotyped as a facial palsy in my mind because of Netflix’s "Dungeon".

In addition, the lineup of this play can also be called Zhongxing Pengyue. Although Gary Oldman played his best role, he tried to maintain decent performance in that aspect, and his inner ambivalence was condemned by his conscience. It was definitely fuller than his typical performance in Batman vs. Superman. many. This allows him to experience a sense of substitution that is almost like watching the protagonist suffer from every time he is facing Micheal Keaton, a shrewd businessman.

The TV host played by Samuel L. Jackson, who is loved by the people, is one of the biggest highlights of the film. First of all, his race adds a strong irony to this role as the mouthpiece of the media. Do you think being black means anti-discrimination pioneer? Do you think that the media that opposes the government must be the embodiment of justice? But they are all puppets of capital. In the final ending, it might be more interesting if he reversed his attack. Just like Fox News in reality, he still has to change sides in time to see that the allies are gone.

Not only the story, but the visual effects and action scenes are also very impressive. As a medium-sized science fiction film, the director obviously knows how to use it on the blade. Robocop's mechanical texture is very realistic from beginning to end, with a heavy metal weight. The only organic organization above (face, hand) does not show any traces of synthesis, unlike many Marvel movies today that are saving money and making a mess.

The shootout is also full of tactical thinking in creative design, and the last fight against the bipedal fighter takes full advantage of the difference in body shape, which is very interesting. Although it can be seen that every gun battle is thinking of ways to save money, it is short and savvy, but fortunately, it is scattered throughout the film, with a large amount, and excellent rhythm. It is not particularly enjoyable but it is not disappointing and boring.

In general, as a classic old IP that seems to be unable to play any tricks, I think this film is really amazing. Except for the final ending, which is too ideal and perfect, I really can't fault it. I don’t know why the box office and evaluation were so satisfactory at home and abroad, because there were not enough shocking big scenes? Or is it because the plot offends the arrogant American? This question is worthy of careful consideration

View more about RoboCop reviews

Extended Reading
  • Dewitt 2022-03-25 09:01:06

    The Brazilian director of this elite unit is stunned to make Robocop Batman Are you kidding me? After watching it continuously, I can understand that the short-lived appearance of the theme, which pays tribute to the old version, is still a full-blown emotional drama. It seems too deliberate and too hard. The era of tough guys is gone forever~

  • Lonzo 2022-03-22 09:01:30

    Robocop "I'm back!" - after watching - after reading the new version, he decisively upgraded the old version to four stars. The original version is more watchable, and as a "fun" movie should be a higher priority. Although this one is not too ugly, it is obviously stuck in the mud of rigid reflection on mechanization and routine - neither new nor thorough thinking.

RoboCop quotes

  • Alex Murphy: Holy Christ, there's nothing left.

    Dr. Dennett Norton: Your body may have gone, but you're still here.

    Alex Murphy: That's not even my brain.

    Dr. Dennett Norton: We had to repair the damaged areas, but we didn't interfere with your emotion or your intellect. Do you... do you understand me, Alex? You're... you're in control.

    Alex Murphy: I'm in control?

    Dr. Dennett Norton: Yes.

    Alex Murphy: Okay. If I'm in control, then I wanna die. Just unplug whatever it is keepin' me alive and end this nightmare.

    Dr. Dennett Norton: Now, say I did that - w-which is, as a doctor, would almost be impossible for me, but... but say I did. Wh... w-what do I say to your wife? What does she say to your son?

    Alex Murphy: That it didn't work. That you tried. Somethin' went wrong. You did everything you could, but I died.

    Dr. Dennett Norton: So after all they've been through, all the pain, all their hope restored, we would just rip that away? Your wife loves you, Alex. She signed the consent forms herself; otherwise, you couldn't have undergone the procedure. She loves you and she gave you a second chance. I need you to take it.

    Alex Murphy: I don't wanna see myself like this again. Ever. And the same goes for my family. Just put me back in.

  • Liz Kline: Dr. Norton, how... how is he doing this?

    Dr. Dennett Norton: His software is faster. His hardware is stronger. He's a better machine.

    Liz Kline: But you said humans hesitate.

    Dr. Dennett Norton: Only when they're making decisions.

    Liz Kline: He's not making decisions?

    Dr. Dennett Norton: Well, yes and no. In his everyday life, man rules over the machine; Alex makes his own decisions. Now, when he engages in battle, the visor comes down and the software takes over, then the... the machine does everything. Alex is a... he's a passenger, just along for the ride.

    Liz Kline: But if the machine is in control, then how is Murphy accountable? Who's pulling the trigger?

    Dr. Dennett Norton: When the machine fights, the system releases signals into Alex's brain making him think he's doing what our computers are actually doing. I mean, Alex believes right now he is in control, but he's not. It... it's the illusion of free will.