Sorry for the title spoiler. When I watched this film, I actually hoped that the character of the coquettish lawyer would be a bad guy. Of course, I also felt that the possibility was too small, and it was too obvious for him to be the villain. I don’t know if he played a villain. What the character will be like. In addition, the old man who paid tribute to the man in black was modeled too much like Jones himself. As a result, when I checked it, it turned out to be the old colleague of the coquettish lawyer.
I feel that this film would have a better effect if it was released in the same year as Team America 3. The first film is based on the negative impact of heroes disarming and returning to the field and Chaoying on society as the discussion point, while the second film is from the anti-hero environment. The story of changing society, this story is more in line with the theme of hero control in Captain America 3, which happens to be the Disney universe. So when I watched this film this year, I had no sympathy for the subject matter. Chaoying seems to be regulated, but it seems that this group of people did not receive any punishment after fighting for justice. Don’t forget that this family was in trouble in the first film. It turned out that the second part was just a simple imprisonment, and it was quickly recruited by a big company. The behavior of a coquettish lawyer who knows the law and violates the law is really not like what a big company would do.
In addition, most of today's Chaoying are educated and have decent jobs, not to mention the local tyrants such as the master, Superman is a reporter, The Flash is a forensic doctor, and the Hulk is a top doctor of physics. And the father in this film, who is also a tall and strong white man, is worried that he can't find a job, and it is also difficult to help his son with his homework. Did he not receive a serious education since he was a child? Under the premise of hiding the ability, apply for a police officer or firefighter or even a security guard.
In contrast, my mother is quite strong. She really used her rubber ability to the extreme. She was so good at flicking and maneuvering that she was just short of the second gear, and she also had the ability to reason, so she could accurately guess who the villain was. It is true that the image of women has always been popular in propaganda and politics. From Michelle before to now, Ivanka is more popular than the men behind it, but this is exactly the same as men, taking advantage of their own gender. And the effect achieved is also inexcusable. Mom's voice sounded a little old, and the face in the animation was noticeably younger. Later, I found out that she was actually a congresswoman of BVS!
This time the little baby is too brilliant and even too "powerful". I feel that the screenwriter is basically putting superpowers into the little baby, which reminds me of the previous plot of the alien baby, which is also regarded as "baby has infinite power". It's a metaphor for "maybe". In contrast, the little son of Scud has basically no performance this time. His super-high-speed ability can reasonably be expected to hang and beat everything, but this time it was obviously weakened a lot. The daughter is still very strong, and this time I also joined the plot of the old-fashioned little boyfriend.
At the end, it seems that the burrower hasn't been caught yet. The third part is estimated to create a villain family, right? Blackening the super-powerful family is fun.
View more about Incredibles 2 reviews
