The middle-aged uncle who finished watching Incredibles2 in the company of a group of children took a silent memory.
Incredibles 2 follows the plot of the first part this time, telling the story of the Fantastic Four, Mr. Incredible's family, after solving the crazy fan problem, after participating in the flash young son's race against the underground people, as well as the extended identity crisis, Continue the theme of the first part - the problem of the hero's life after the hero is illegal. The focus of the second part is also on the family. In the first part, we also know that Jack-Jack Parr (the Chinese translation is called Ba Xiaojie, so the Chinese translation of the father's name is Bob, so let him be named Ba =. =) has super powers including transformation Wait, in this one, we found that he has more super powers, such as Cyclops, clone, dimension crossing, fire, deformation and so on. At the same time, I saw that violet has a new use of her protective cover (however, because there is no theoretical time difference between this and the previous one, it is a bit unreasonable to directly develop new skills). And the wife who loves to see Yan frozone, I really want to hear a m**f**k from him.
Villain Analysis
This villain's behavior and motives, I do not understand a little bit. In such a social setting, it is actually very difficult for heroes to come back. Most of what happened in the first part was on the island, and the giant robot at the end was stopped by them before they did any serious damage. Immediately after the second part of the first plot, they were caught as criminals after fighting the underground people. In the police station, the banker said angrily that it would be better to let him rob and not do anything, and the insurance would cover everything. Since then, the government departments that have been dealing with superheroes have also been closed. It can be said that superheroes have entered a low point. At this time, it was the villain who single-handedly contributed to the return of the hero. The villain's plan is to create a bad guy, then let the hero defeat him, then let the public see the process, and finally when the public and the government can accept the hero's return and sign the hero's return bill, then control those heroes to do it. some bad things. So if you don't cooperate with this thing at the beginning, the hero will disappear silently, and there will be no such story. When I was sitting in the movie theater and saw that the villain had such OP skills, my inner os was that you can do so much more, but this? The inner thought at the time was that you could have direct control over everyone, rule the world, things like that , or directly control the hero to do bad things. But at that time, I began to refute myself, saying that because the villain itself is not a bad person, he just hates the hero, so he will not use his skill to do particularly bad things, and if he directly controls the hero to do bad things, it is just a direct creation Having a villain doesn't make people's perceptions of heroes any worse. But what I can't convince myself is that the situation in which the hero was described in the early stage is already so unbearable, so why do we need to do this, instead of letting him die silently, it will help him return to the top.
In fact, these kinds of movies are obviously very predictable. When the two brothers and sisters appeared, I thought there must be something wrong with them. In the end, as I expected, this sister is the villain. The difference between an older brother and a younger sister is really the difference between the thinking of a typical boy and a girl. Boys worship heroes and girls want safety. (Why don't you put the emergency phone in the safe house? Black question mark) And when my brother said that he would invite dignitaries from all over the world to join the cruise, hey, isn't this certain to happen =. =flag is too obvious to stand up!
Disney's father is really naughty, he likes to be linked with Star Wars so much = = Finally, he used the stalk of Star Wars Han Solo.
superhero question
The legalization of superheroes has always been an issue in superhero-themed works. From watchman to BvS to Captain America 3 Civil War, this issue is involved. When a person's strength is strong enough to easily break the legal boundaries, how to restrict the person's behavior has always been involved in various works. Can we simply expect this person to uphold his moral standards? Power corrupts, but what about power? as said in bvs
-He has the power to wipe out the entire Human race and if we believe there is even one percent chance that he is our enemy, we have to take it as an absolute certainty.
-But he is not our enemy.
-Not today.
So Who watches watchman?
At the same time, there are scenes in it that remind me of the American gun problem. It is the part of the robbery in the movie that is very familiar. In order to prevent gangsters, I put something like a security phone at home, but putting the security phone in the study is like a gun at home for self-protection. Because of the so-called safety problem, the gun is placed in one place, and the bullets are locked and placed in another place. Then, if a dangerous situation really occurs, how can you protect yourself? It's like holding a pistol in your hand, but the bullets are in the living room, and the gangster is in the living room at this time. How can you fix it? It's better not to have a gun. If you don't have a gun, the gangster may take the money and run away. Was your first reaction to shoot? Just like in the movie, the gangster's gun has reached his head. At this time, even if the phone gets through and the hero receives the call, what can be changed? This is just a spiritual sustenance. If something really happens, you still have to protect yourself by yourself.
Assume everyone will betray you. And you will never be disappointed. (I'm also naughty)
last of the last
Rich people, get some decent security.
Yes, don't look at anyone else, it's you, Wayne.
View more about Incredibles 2 reviews
