It's a bit of a thoughtful movie, but overall it's not a bad movie or a parallel import. The expression is too one-sided and the conception is not sophisticated enough. The person on the phone stands on the moral high ground but regards life as a child's play, and the face of a savior is disgusting!
He charges others with lies and contempt, but he himself is the one who despises the bottom of society the most. In order to make the male protagonist terrify for his purpose of playing with him, he killed the groom at will, and in order to escape the crime, he unceremoniously killed the pizza delivery person. Compared with the male protagonist's derailment, deception and impoliteness, his heart is much more vicious! The darkest and most vicious person like this still acts as a guardian of justice to guide the country and sprinkle chicken soup at the end? Either I'm crazy or the writers are crazy.
It doesn't matter whether a person is vicious or kind, hypocritical and toothless, it's ironic that he can trouble the screenwriter and director to express what he wants to express, and let a vicious, hypocritical and vicious villain guide others to understand the true meaning of life.
The main character portrayed in a movie is completely self-contradictory and can't stand scrutiny, which leads to the whole movie can't stand up to scrutiny. No matter how novel the idea is, the chicken soup at the end is a joke.
The most basic ideas and fundamentally contradictory films, in my opinion, are parallel imports. Two stars for the actor's acting.
View more about Phone Booth reviews
