For a low-budget film, the "thriller" point of this film is relatively innovative.
Personal judgment, the mastermind behind this story is - "Dink"
He is the only IT guy pointed to in the film
After Lola checked the fan records of other female anchors on the live broadcast website, it can be seen that Dink has flirted with many female anchors before.
I was also infatuated with the number one babygirl, but Dink is an extremely "infatuated" it guy with little financial ability. Some of his extreme pursuits led to the babygirl's suicide or "death" in other ways. There are also speculations. It may be that Dink directly "murdered" (possibly) the babygirl, and cloned her through artificial intelligence.
And lola is Dink's second goal.
The specific implementation method is:
Method: pure numbers:
Through the previous hundreds of hours of live video, Dink uses deep learning to model characters, anchors the face through facial recognition technology, and renders the facial model in real time. There is also a "speech synthesis part" that requires deep learning. , a text dialogue engine (a very advanced neural network architecture) is constructed through natural language processing. This is the Turing part. In the process of communicating with "interactive" objects, the text output is displayed in the form of language synthesis. In addition, the whole house is a 3D model, but through some non-existing level rendering method to make the picture approximate to the video effect of the recorded part of lola, it may also need to apply AR related environment scanning technology.
Dink obtains satisfaction through the digitization of "objects", which can be seen from the video of Dink and fake lola.
Hypothesis: Dink has no financial ability (before and Lola's Lian Mai specially gave the camera a description: he has no money), so he is not very favored by female anchors, but if Dink realizes this surreal AI technology... Then he will not There should be no money... = - =!
Assumption 2: He is a crazy AI developer...
What is certain is that fake lola is an artificial intelligence dialogue engine, it does not understand what it is doing, so it is cheated by lola to return the password, the password is not a common artificially generated password combination, and the behavior of fake lola is still not a For the performance of strong AI, as long as the heroine gives enough "rewards", events that meet the interaction conditions of fake lola can happen. So, lola spent 50,000 tokens for Lianmai.
It is also certain that what Lola experienced also happened to babygirl, but the latter failed to survive.
(Dink said to the heroine: you're strong, u will make it through. )
(Dink said to the heroine: no matter who do this to u , i gonna find him. Dink knew it was himself, so it was Him)
(The heroine asked Dink: who do you think she is... Dink said: some lowlife... so inferior = =)
But maybe Dink has the plan to help the heroine "solve problems, gain love, and embrace beauty..."
Followed by:
The virtual babygirl and lola are AI models run by Dink with the same architecture. Because they use the same "training" material, there will be some scenes where lola's lines and babygirl's lines are interchanged.
So, maybe Dink is just collecting many, many female anchors he likes and then "synthesizing" them into one of his own... digital girlfriends = =! cough cough
Interestingly, this film also involved the blockchain. The virtual currency in the general live broadcast room is not called token.
As the token of blockchain, token has the characteristics of anonymity and decentralization.
It is normal for the films produced by Netflix to have strong technical reflections. Regarding fake lola and real lola, for the audience in the live broadcast room:
If you can't tell, does it matter? (This line is from Westworld)
There is a small detail: "Dink asked the heroine to call him arnold, and arnold is one of the co-founders of Westworld and a very defiant Ai programmer =-= , is this a tribute?"
You can add more, for example, the uncle went to the toilet to find lola or something (I only read it once, I didn't read many details, and there are still many places to fast forward. = =!)
View more about Cam reviews
