The play at least prompts thinking about three pairs of relationships.
The first is crime and punishment. Crime and punishment are generally used for a single individual, that is, the subject of crime and punishment are one, and the logic of karma is followed. But this film presents such a picture and thinking that crime and punishment can also be a human-to-human relationship. In such an interaction and cycle, a victim may just be a potential perpetrator, even if it is not enough. Crimes in the legal sense also at least lay the groundwork for subsequent violence by those affected by them.
Second, the individual and society. When the society changes rapidly, it will inevitably affect the individuals who make up the society, especially their psychology, thinking and mental state. So the routines and assumptions of ten years ago may no longer explain current crimes. Of course, these people also participate as an important part of all individuals in shaping the reaction of society.
Third, interpreters and actors. Many crime-related film and television works have shown such a situation. The more difficult the case is, the more it is necessary for the solver to put himself in the position of the criminal to imitate the thinking and behavior of the criminal, so that after so long, they have become more and more in addition to their starting point. resemblance.
There is a saying that is well said, if you want to understand and especially understand a person, you can read what he has written, read books he has read, go to places he has been, and meet his friends. Following a loved one is the same, and so is the prisoner.
The film is more boring than "True Detective 1" and is suitable for watching alone on a quiet night, but if the surrounding is noisy or too bright, it may be difficult to watch, and there are so many inextricably linked with "True Detective 1". Common ground, interesting.
View more about Mindhunter reviews
