a little thought

Kailyn 2022-03-24 09:01:36

I just finished watching it. Although the whole plot is very well-designed, I think it is based on my husband's lack of calmness and the police's enticement in the later period. Personally, I think there are still many loopholes. If the male protagonist refuses to admit, is there any direct evidence that he planned the murder? Yes, he saved some money, he changed the keys (and this is still deniable) but so what? Why condemn him? There is no direct evidence. Another, the first case was the wife's murder of a robber or a blackmailer. To close the case, you must first prove that she was in self-defense, but this cannot be proved. All the evidence points to the wife's murder by extortion. The motive is very clear: the deceased Steal wife's bag, find letter, then blackmail. The wife gave money once, but didn't get a letter back. This time extorted again, the wife decided to kill him. So asking him to come to the door created the illusion of being robbed and killed in self-defense, and the murderer's key appeared in his wife's bag, which just showed that they had contacted before. Maybe the wife got the key wrong in the process of extortion? All the evidence can prove that she is the murderer. The killer came in through the door, the door was opened by the wife, so the window was not broken. And what does it mean when a key appears under the carpet at the door? It's just a spare home key, it's been too long and I've forgotten it. As long as the husband does not admit the crime, how can he prove his plan with the killer? Just how many keys? Or rely on her husband to hide some private money? This is completely unprovable. There are also many unreasonable things in the police investigation process, such as stealing a change of clothes and keys. Is the evidence obtained in this way legal? Privately let the related person (wife's lover) intervene in the investigation, many of the plots are just speculation without evidence to prove it. Although the whole storyline is very well designed, if you think about it carefully, it is still based on her husband's lack of calmness and the police's enticement, and there are still problems. A little personal opinion, we can discuss it. A little personal opinion, we can discuss it. A little personal opinion, we can discuss it. A little personal opinion, we can discuss it. A little personal opinion, we can discuss it. A little personal opinion, we can discuss it. A little personal opinion, we can discuss it. A little personal opinion, we can discuss it. A little personal opinion, we can discuss it. A little personal opinion, we can discuss it. A little personal opinion, we can discuss it. A little personal opinion, we can discuss it. A little personal opinion, we can discuss it. A little personal opinion, we can discuss it. A little personal opinion, we can discuss it. A little personal opinion, we can discuss it. A little personal opinion, everyone can Discuss. A little personal opinion, we can discuss it.

View more about Dial M for Murder reviews

Extended Reading
  • Krystel 2022-01-27 08:06:55

    The disagreement between the action-based hypothesis and actual operation (expected the loss of murder), and the completely different interpretation of the past within the mind in a flash (Tony’s idea to frame his wife), and above the possibility The again derived confusion that returns to the truth but is missing a link of logic (the writer Mark’s conjecture) implicitly points to the interesting contrast relationship between the virtual and the reality, which is a tiny difference between the virtual and the real, which can be said to be a theory of Bergson’s memory circuit. Interesting application. In addition, the screenwriter’s brainstorming ability to round out the story is admirable, which can be regarded as a brainstorming script writing.

  • Issac 2022-03-22 09:01:34

    Even from the point of view of business type, Xi Fatt is really no one as Agatha in the movie. He has an excellent grasp of rhythm, psychological grasp, and unexpected and reasonable development and transformation of the plot. He is worthy of this type of suspense. The master of the story, the ups and downs and exquisiteness of the story alone, its complexity has long surpassed many so-called classics in the future, and this film is a suitable example. Instead of giving the film the hat of second semiotic analysis and other film theories, it is better to admit that this is a pure suspense film, hearty and soul-stirring.

Dial M for Murder quotes

  • [first lines]

    Margot Mary Wendice: let me get you another drink. Mark, before Tony comes I ought to explain something.

    Mark Halliday: Yes, I've been waiting for that.

    Margot Mary Wendice: I haven't told him anything about us.

  • Margot Mary Wendice: Oh, there you are. We thought you were never coming. What have you been up to?

    Tony Wendice: I'm sorry darling, but the boss came in just as I was leaving.

    Margot Mary Wendice: Tony, this is Mark Halliday.

    Tony Wendice: Hello Mark.

    Mark Halliday: Hello.