When I first watched this documentary, it was full of comedy. He told the story of an American high school student who was suspended from school because he was suspected of drawing a big dick on his staff car. The high school student's name is Dylan. He is arrogant and uninhibited by nature, and because he likes to play pranks, he generally has no good comments in the mouths of other classmates. And another student named Alex. He came forward and said he was a witness at the scene, claiming that the day of the incident, he saw Dylan draw a picture of a dick on the car. In addition, one of the teachers also believed that the prank was done by Di Lun. Dylan has always been at odds with this teacher, and has played tricks on this teacher countless times. This time, the female teacher was not only painted with a dick pattern on the car, but also the tire was cut. This is also explained in the school's Securities Regulatory Commission. It seemed as if this prank must have been done by Dillon. But because the case was too bad, it attracted the attention of the school and the majority of students. That's why this documentary was filmed. The filming of the documentary is another host, Peter. He has an avid hobby of filmmaking for family reasons, and has always wanted to make good films. The documentary begins with a video of his deeply detailed interview with Dylan. From some of Di Lun's performances, it seems that he really did not do this. Each of the previous reasons can be rebutted. So this incident of painting a dick, doesn't it really prove that the bad boy did it? With the development of the plot, the photographer Peter launched a clear and logical exploration. Through small clues and countless interviews with characters, the scope of suspects has been gradually narrowed. The way in which it is used is simply amazing. The strong logical reasoning of the film is the main color. Of course, some details of the characters will be misled in the middle, and some wrong attempts will be made. But Peter's earnestness and unyielding efforts and the solidarity of his partners. Let the case gradually become clear. As the plot progressed, I became more and more drawn to it because the documentary revealed some untold facts during the filming process. A school girl who is impressed is a sex addict; a teacher was fired because his speech in the filming of the documentary affected the interests of the school; a person like Alex who has a humble existence but wants to get more attention, A series of lies; a prestigious teacher used all means to get some students suspended because he hated them... This documentary exposes too many human shortcomings, which makes this documentary even more real and meaningful. One of the right things to do when this documentary started filming was to expose it. With the growing influence of documentaries, there are also more and more The more people supported Dylan, the students who hoped that the final case would come to light also provided all kinds of reliable and unreliable clues. But on the other hand, this documentary is constantly exposing the other side of human nature. As the case became more and more troublesome, it had threatened the interests of the school. Later, the school's official statement was not allowed to shoot again and spread among students. Mark was also suspended. But he still did not give up shooting. I think what he expects is not only his persistence in the case, but also his persistence and patience in his shooting career. This makes me admire the courage of the photographer. By the seventh episode, the case finally came to light. The perpetrator didn't expect it to be Dylan's ***. Because one of the teachers involved had an improper relationship with his mother, which hit him too hard, this case happened. However, the ending did not specify the specific situation in detail, but left suspense, but what is certain is that the perpetrator has finally been found. from the beginning of shooting. The correctness of what many people say and do is not suspected of being correct, which is obviously interfered with by subjective notions. Therefore, when watching the plot, it is easy to be influenced by the mind and feel that the perpetrator is someone else. This is also what the photographer Mark wants to tell us. When you are disturbed by subjective ideas, there is no way to find the real perpetrator. At this point you need to go back to the truth and judge the truth through your own reasoning. I think that's one of the highlights of the documentary as well. Learn to observe and distinguish, learn to judge from the perspective of facts, and don't be easily misled by others. After watching this documentary, I believe that many people can't tell the difference between a drama and a documentary. The filming is so real that in addition to fluctuating moods due to the development of the plot of the case, it can also bring you a lot of thinking. For example, in the face of facts and illusions, do you have to accept some truths that are not very happy to be accepted. For example, when your own interests are violated, do you still have to stick to the original idea and resist the powerful forces that prevent you from pursuing the truth. For example, how do you judge the truth and the lie, and avoid being blinded by the lie. The piece finally got to the bottom of it. The perpetrator didn't expect it to be Dylan's ***. Because one of the teachers involved had an improper relationship with his mother, which hit him too hard, this case happened. However, the ending did not specify the specific situation in detail, but left suspense, but what is certain is that the perpetrator has finally been found. from the beginning of shooting. The correctness of what many people say and do is not suspected of being correct, which is obviously interfered with by subjective notions. Therefore, when watching the plot, it is easy to be influenced by the mind and feel that the perpetrator is someone else. This is also what the photographer Mark wants to tell us. When you are disturbed by subjective ideas, there is no way to find the real perpetrator. At this point you need to go back to the truth and judge the truth through your own reasoning. I think that's one of the highlights of the documentary as well. Learn to observe and distinguish, learn to judge from the perspective of facts, and don't be easily misled by others. After watching this documentary, I believe that many people can't tell the difference between a drama and a documentary. The filming is so real that in addition to fluctuating moods due to the development of the plot of the case, it can also bring you a lot of thinking. For example, in the face of facts and illusions, do you have to accept some truths that are not very happy to be accepted. For example, when your own interests are violated, do you still have to stick to the original idea and resist the powerful forces that prevent you from pursuing the truth. For example, how do you judge the truth and the lie, and avoid being blinded by the lie. The piece finally got to the bottom of it. The perpetrator didn't expect it to be Dylan's ***. Because one of the teachers involved had an improper relationship with his mother, which hit him too hard, this case happened. However, the ending did not specify the specific situation in detail, but left suspense, but what is certain is that the perpetrator has finally been found. from the beginning of shooting. The correctness of what many people say and do is not suspected of being correct, which is obviously interfered with by subjective notions. Therefore, when watching the plot, it is easy to be influenced by the mind and feel that the perpetrator is someone else. This is also what the photographer Mark wants to tell us. When you are disturbed by subjective ideas, there is no way to find the real perpetrator. At this point you need to go back to the truth and judge the truth through your own reasoning. I think that's one of the highlights of the documentary as well. Learn to observe and distinguish, learn to judge from the perspective of facts, and don't be easily misled by others. After watching this documentary, I believe that many people can't tell the difference between a drama and a documentary. The filming is so real that in addition to fluctuating moods due to the development of the plot of the case, it can also bring you a lot of thinking. For example, in the face of facts and illusions, do you have to accept some truths that are not very happy to be accepted. For example, when your own interests are violated, do you still have to stick to the original idea and resist the powerful forces that prevent you from pursuing the truth. For example, how do you judge the truth and the lie, and avoid being blinded by the lie. Whether to accept some truth that is not very happy to be accepted. For example, when your own interests are violated, do you still have to stick to the original idea and resist the powerful forces that prevent you from pursuing the truth. For example, how do you judge the truth and the lie, and avoid being blinded by the lie. Whether to accept some truth that is not very happy to be accepted. For example, when your own interests are violated, do you still have to stick to the original idea and resist the powerful forces that prevent you from pursuing the truth. For example, how do you judge the truth and the lie, and avoid being blinded by the lie.
View more about American Vandal reviews
