Why is this kind of bad movie so high score (contains a lot of spoilers, be cautious about the feelings of the party)

Jean 2022-03-23 09:01:24

This is the second movie I want to sleep in at the cinema. It's now in 8012. Why does the United States want to make this kind of movie? Why not go to see Mission Impossible 5!

Talking nonsense accounted for 60% of the whole conversation, so I took pictures of me chasing cars without passion on the streets of Paris. The most exciting time was only 10 minutes: the helicopter crashed into the gap of the snow-capped mountains at the end, and by the way, I took a picture of how exciting the night scene of the Grand Palais in Paris was. It's gone. I give 1 point.

Talking about the plot, there is basically no suspense, that is, the male protagonist dropped a few "hard cores" (can't remember what they called) in order to save his teammates, and then a bad agent came in between, and the male protagonist went to find a "Luck". People. The male protagonist can't beat "Luck", and the female protagonist robbed "Luck". The male protagonist faked Rack, negotiated with the middleman, and rescued the terrorist organization's big boss (to avoid a large number of police deaths during the robbery) bad agents framed the male protagonist, the male protagonist and teammates exposed the bad agents, a melee broke out, and the captain died. Then the male lead team went to the male lead’s ex-wife’s medical camp. The male lead caught up with the helicopter, grabbed the launcher and removed the battery, preventing the big boss’s "hard core" launch to save the world.

By the way, there was also a blond female middleman interspersed in the middle, and kissed the male lead (except for the first appearance to force the male lead to rescue the big boss, the back is useless, except for the finale)

I just went to the cinema downstairs to watch the premiere. Isn’t it a tribute to so many reviews? Oh my God! Did you take it seriously? Hey, so many bad movies to win the box office is really enough to ruin my Tom Cruise male god. Can the audience be serious?

Oh, by the way, if someone wants to say "Ah, this chase, this helicopter crashed, this action is really beautiful" I said, the real essence does not exceed 10 minutes. There are countless movies. These car chases are no better than speed and passion. Helicopter shooting is no better than countless movies of shooting and chasing with guns on helicopters. It would look great if it was placed in 2000, but in 8012, it is far more exciting than him. Even some parkour clips posted on the Internet are really cooler than Tom's Parkour (although he is older, it can’t be a reason not to be exciting enough)

The biggest flaw of this movie is that it can't stretch the wonderful clips, but instead gives most of the time to the boring clips. And the wonderful clips are no better than other movies. What’s even more funny is that it’s now in 8012. People only look at their feelings but not their level. It’s really sigh!

During that time, I yawned no less than ten times with the person on my left and right. . There are too many boring clips. You really think it looks good, so you won’t be able to take it away. As an audience who has spent money in the cinema for so long and can't fast forward, I have the right to evaluate! If you want to look good, you can go to the cinema to book the show (bye bye manually)

View more about Mission: Impossible - Fallout reviews

Extended Reading

Mission: Impossible - Fallout quotes

  • Wolf Blitzer: Stand by. I'm told we're about to get some additional information. I've just been handed a document from Nils Delbruuk, a nuclear weapons specialist who claims to have built the weapons used in these attacks. I've been asked to read this manifesto in its entirety. "There has never been peace without first a great suffering. The greater the suffering, the greater the peace. As mankind is drawn to his self-destruction like a moth to the candle, the so-called defenders of peace - the church, the government, the law - work tirelessly to save humanity from itself. But, by averting disaster, they serve to delay a peace that can only come through an inevitable baptism of fire. The suffering I bring you is not the beginning of the end. It is the beginning of a greater mutual understanding through common suffering. It is the first step toward the ultimate brotherhood of man. The suffering I bring you is the bridge to ultimate peace."

  • Page from "The Destruction of the Current World Order" Manifesto written by John Lark and seen during Ethan Hunt's briefing.: "There has never been peace without first a great suffering, the greater the suffering, the greater the peace. As mankind is drawn to his self-destruction like a moth to the candle, the so-called defenders of peace - the church, the government, the law - work tirelessly to save humanity from itself. But, by averting disaster, they serve to delay a peace that can only come through an inevitable baptism of fire. The suffering I bring you is not the beginning of the end. It is the beginning of a greater mutual understanding through common suffering. It is the first step towards the ultimate brotherhood of man. The suffering I bring you is the bridge to ultimate peace. Today, mankind has been handed the opportunity to escape his destiny, an otherwise inevitable conclusion to a thousand years of intolerance and fear. I call all rationalists who can stand and join in the struggle against the radical theists, all of which fall beneath a common umbrella of ideology. If we were to continue any further we would reach mythology and Aesop's fables. When do we stop? Any belief in a spirituality with no other proof, other than the cravings to project one's self over the rational thinking of the others must be eradicated as it does not only halt progression and development of the human mind and reach, but also hinders it. Here I will emphasize clearly that the judgment upheld against us will be one of human hands, not of a god or other worldly being. Part of the absurd rational is what leads to the obscure justifications, the believers place upon their own disgraceful and belligerent behavior. No. The loss of human life cannot and will not be justified. For this is not the taking of human lives. They are merely puppets, hollow shells that were once human beings. Brainwashed by stories and tales of old, their weak minds have been overpowered by the pressure placed on them by other lifeless puppets. And so, the cycle continues."