As far as the movie is concerned, the script can be given five stars, the director is only worth two stars, and the performance of the actors can be praised with four stars. But as a smeared medical mouth, I just want to give two stars.
After watching the movie, I feel very sad, very sad, and I don't want to talk. The feeling of mourning is not because of tears. To be honest, although I was touched several times throughout the movie, I didn’t cry. But what is most frustrating is the deep sense of powerlessness, powerless to change our medical situation, which is completely suppressed by the West, and powerless to change people's prejudice against the medical system.
No spoilers, just as Gleevec said, India is cheap because they ignored the patent protection and copied it after successful R&D in Switzerland. Switzerland is researched by private companies, and it is natural to consider the issue of profitability. Personally, I am engaged in scientific research in the medical department. Our department also has hundreds of millions of scientific research funds every year. This is a small experimental group. This kind of major research and development will inevitably cost more. I checked the data and said that it was more than one billion US dollars. So as far as Swiss companies are concerned their pricing is not a problem, the problem is that we were born in tc without imperial support and still trying to rise.
Yes, it is also a developing country, India can be allowed by wto regardless of patent protection, and our ZTE is sanctioned by billions of dollars just for reselling. Are you willing to send out a lot of foreign exchange when the medicine is so expensive in China? But is there a way? It seems that the investment in scientific research is getting higher and higher, and the amount of sci is more and more, but we use thousands of reagents at the price of microliters, and all the instruments we use are imported. Even with the same experimental results, because you are a domestic laboratory, you need more complete and detailed experimental results than foreign laboratories to publish an article with the same score. Why, because the journal is foreign. We have caught up with the fourth technological revolution, and we are already at the world's leading level in industry and networking. As for the modern medical field dominated by Western medicine, which has been weak for hundreds of years, we are still far, far away.
However, what I saw in the film was not this kind of reflection. The director simply aimed the muzzle at the doctor-patient relationship, at the PCs who enforced the law according to the law, and portrayed them as accomplices and executioners of Swiss medical representatives. The villain, even the only PC who seems to have a conscience, violated his professional ethics before becoming a positive image in the movie. It seems that if these people are killed, the patient will be able to usher in his own spring. Don't hospitals want their patients to live? In fact, doctors in real life will take the initiative to introduce you to the use of medicines that can be covered by medical insurance, and will suggest that you buy the Indian imitation version and allow you to use it with one eye closed, far from the image of the doctor in the movie. Let you die coldly. The real way to solve the predicament is the real all-round rise of our own country, and our scientific research strength has been fundamentally improved, so that we can independently develop this revolutionary "life-saving medicine".
Yes, I believe that the drugs we developed by ourselves will never be so expensive, because the source of domestic research funding is basically all non-profit state financial appropriations, not individual investment in private R&D laboratories in capitalist countries. That is, the high cost of research and development is borne by the state, and patients only need to pay the price of the drug itself. Only in this way can patients truly embrace the hope of their own lives, rather than relying on the kindness of a few drug dealers or PCs.
So I said, this movie is completely biased, why do you make people sad? Why do you target innocent people? Shouldn't you inspire people to work for the weak? Strive for inadequacy?
There is also the slogan that once felt earthy and empty, but now it is not unpleasant, reading for the rise of China
After the film review, I will continue to be a hard-working scientific research dog tomorrow. I hope that when fans scold me, think about what you have said about improving the treatment of scientists, and show mercy. Thank you.
————————Early update on July 7————————
In fact, many comments do not intend to refute, and there are indeed mixed people on the Internet, and it is meaningless to argue with people with other purposes. Deliberately distorting my meaning, inexplicably insulting, I didn't delete them anyway, and discerning people can make their own judgments. In the past few days, there have been a lot of film reviews that agree with me that the film is one-sided and masked, and I am still relatively happy. All in all, normal and kind people should also hope that our country will become better and better, but for such a movie that deliberately flattens the so-called "villain" image in order to cater to the audience's psychological and social conflict hotspots, I hope It's hilarious that it has become a breakthrough for changing society. It can't reflect the real movie, what it can change is only the producer's pocket.
View more about Dying to Survive reviews
