Shocking insider view

Jordane 2022-03-22 09:01:37

Wei Heng's torment in personal interests and public interests is vividly interpreted, and his family is the health of the public. In the end, he chose to give up his own personal interests and make the truth public. But after all, the power is limited, and it is imprisoned by all parties. Even his wife and children left him.

Bergman also encountered the same problem and was under pressure from the top, but in order to let everyone know the inside story of tobacco, and also for the professional ethics of a journalist, and more importantly, to fulfill his promise to Wigan. Use yourself as a piece of news and let other peers break the news. In the end, it was because of this promise that he voluntarily quit his job.

At the end of the film, their efforts were realized, although they achieved their original purpose, but as Bergman said: "What has been won." Won the public's right to know and the resistance to big business.

Finally, let's talk about the film itself, which is indeed a bit procrastinating. I didn't get into the topic for the first half hour, but I really insisted on watching it.

View more about The Insider reviews

Extended Reading
  • Abelardo 2022-04-24 07:01:05

    There is a reason why two great movie stars participate in the performance. This is a classic of communication. Justice and compromise are hard choices, and the power of journalists is strong, provided the press is free.

  • Diego 2022-03-25 09:01:07

    The two-and-a-half-hour version I watched was so procrastinating that I wanted to fall asleep at one point. The subject matter is very valuable for discussion. Since ancient times, fighting against power has been an extremely difficult and painful thing for ordinary people.

The Insider quotes

  • Lowell Bergman: [Kluster demands that Wigand's interview be censored into an alternate version] I'm not touching my film.

    Eric Kluster: I'm afraid you are.

    Lowell Bergman: No, I'm not.

    Eric Kluster: We're doing this with or without you, Lowell. If you like, I can sign another producer to edit your show.

    Lowell Bergman: Uh, since when has the paragon of investigative journalism allowed LAWYERS to determine the news content on 60 Minutes?

  • Mike Wallace: You heard Mr. Sandefur say before Congress that he believed nicotine was not addictive.

    Jeffrey Wigand: I believe Mr. Sandefur perjured himself because I watched those testimonies very carefully.

    Mike Wallace: All of us did, and it was this whole line of people, whole line of CEOs up there, all swearing.

    Jeffrey Wigand: Part of the reason I'm here is that I felt that their representations clearly misstated - at least within Brown and Williamson's representation - clearly misstated what is common language within the company: "We are in the nicotine delivery business."

    Mike Wallace: And that's what cigarettes are for.

    Jeffrey Wigand: A delivery device for nicotine.

    Mike Wallace: A delivery device for nicotine. Put it in your mouth, light it up, and you're gonna get your fix.

    Jeffrey Wigand: You're gonna get your fix.

    Mike Wallace: You're saying that Brown and Williamson manipulates and adjusts the nicotine fix not by artificially adding nicotine but by enhancing the effect of nicotine through the use of elements such as ammonia?

    Jeffrey Wigand: The process is known as "impact boosting". While not spiking nicotine, they clearly manipulate it. There was extensive use of this technology known as "ammonia chemistry". It allows for the nicotine to be more rapidly absorbed in the lung and therefore affect the brain and central nervous system. The straw that broke the camel's back for me, and really put me in trouble with Sandefur, was a compound called coumarin. When I came on board at B. and W., they had tried the transition from coumarin to a similar flavor that would give the same taste, and had been unsuccessful. I wanted out immediately. I was told that it could affect sales, so I should mind my own business. I constructed a memo to Mr. Sandefur indicating I could not in conscience continue with coumarin, a product we now know and we had documentation was similar to coumadin, a lung-specific carcinogen.

    Mike Wallace: And you sent the documents to Sandefur?

    Jeffrey Wigand: I sent the documents forward to Sandefur. I was told that we would continue to work on a substitute but we weren't going to remove it as it would impact sales, and that was his decision.

    Mike Wallace: In other words, you were charging Sandefur and Brown and Williamson with ignoring health considerations consciously?

    Jeffrey Wigand: Most certainly.

    Mike Wallace: And on March 24th, Thomas Sandefur, CEO of Brown and Williamson, had you fired. And the reason he gave you?

    Jeffrey Wigand: "Poor communication skills."

    Mike Wallace: And you wish you hadn't come forward? You wish you hadn't blown the whistle?

    Jeffrey Wigand: Yeah, at times I wish I hadn't done it. There were times I felt compelled to do it. If you ask me would I do it again, do I think it's worth it? Yeah, I think it's worth it.