Never in my film-watching history have there been such magnanimous works. Fellini has, but he is serious. Some people say that Monroe is a vase, Sugar is a woman who worships money, and Wilder is a erotic sidekick. But what's the problem? Vases, money worship, and erotic edge balls can be a problem in any other work, but this script is not a problem: in "Passion", the weakness of human nature is self-consistent. Some people say that the topic of gender is shallow, but comedy has a philosophy of comedy that doesn't require in-depth debate, but instead focuses on those few manifesto moments. Comedy disappoints when obsessing over a topic gets in the way of humor itself. For example, is there any thought that can be more direct, and more ambiguous than the scene of Sugar kissing Josephine in a wig? In that shot, Sugar and Josephine are in the foreground and center of the shot, and the musicians in the background watch them kiss with a calm expression; Josephine's face is turned away from the camera, and only his wig is visible throughout the kiss. So it includes everything: friendship, heterosexual love, gender mixing, gender ambiguity, acting, same-sex love expressed, and with the clever design of the script, no matter when you see it Anything, will be moved by it. This is the philosophy of "Passion Like Fire", why do we need to delve into the meaning of those terms, why do we divide these groups of people, and are limited by such and such viewpoints? When we get an intuitive touch, these things disappear and disintegrate.
View more about Some Like It Hot reviews
