I rarely write movie reviews, I'm lazy.
But after reading other people's writings, many misleading, obviously very simple things have been raised to a high level by these people. I am afraid that even the director never thought that the film he made would have such a profound artistic conception. See it? Is it to show that you are beyond the director's shooting ideas? Then you are superman.
The movie "The Third Man" tells about an era of war, an actress had no money and no status, a gangster made money by making a fortune in the war, so he took care of her, the woman fell in love with the man for a long time, and the gangster gave her life Needed, such as applying for a fake passport to live in Vienna, giving money, etc. But the gangster's behavior was shameful for the morals of the time and violated the law, so the gangster pretended to be dead to escape the police arrest, but the woman knew that the gangster was not dead, because 1) At the beginning, the woman was in The priest's soil was not received before the tomb, nor was it scattered into the tomb; 2) In the end, when the gangster died, the woman took the priest's soil and sprinkled it into the tomb; ------- These two points prove that the woman The only thing is to know that the gangster didn't die in the beginning, otherwise it would have spread the soil in the beginning. 3) The gangster sometimes went to the woman's house, but saw someone upstairs, so he hid it, but was discovered by the cat who went downstairs, and then discovered by the writer---------This 1 point proves that the gangster I often come to the girl's house on a date.
The reason why the woman pretends not to know is because the gangster is her umbrella, and of course she has to cover him.
And the writer fell in love with the girl. When he didn't know the gangster died, he wanted to track down what happened. After all, he was his good friend, not to mention a rich friend. He came to look for a backer at the beginning, and now the backer is gone for no reason. I'm sure I'm uncomfortable, and it's normal to investigate. When he knows that the gangster is not dead, the woman is the wife of a friend, and the wife of a friend cannot be bullied, so he has an inner conflict. On the one hand, he wants to marry a woman, and on the other hand, he cannot give up his friendship. what to do? At this time, he knew from the police that the gangster was doing bad things, so he saw the opportunity and wanted to use the police to get rid of the gangster, but after the woman knew it, she didn't agree, and if the writer still did this, she would break up. This made the writer contradicted again, and changed to normal. It is estimated that he would not care about it and go home or marry a woman. But it was the chaotic period of the war years, and finally he decided to cooperate with the police to get rid of the gangster, which could not only be a hero, but also cut off a woman's back path (not let her follow the gangster).
So the gangster died under the gun of the writer, (why kill the gangster instead of sending it to the court, this is also the author's inauthentic place: the gangster is afraid of revenge in the future).
The writer originally thought that the woman would follow him this time, but the woman ignored him, because the woman saw clearly that he was not friends enough, and she also murdered her friends. Although the woman herself was very difficult, she still faced the problem of having no money and no friends. She was kicked out of the country, but she also didn't want to be in the company of villains like writers. As for the writer, without the feelings of friends and love, he is empty-handed and has to smoke suffocating cigarettes.
The director wants to say: Don't do things too badly for the sake of women, betray all your friends, and you will get nothing in the end.
The simple purpose of performance is regarded by some people as how superb the shooting technology is. Please note that those movie shooting techniques are all for the purpose of showing the plot and purpose, and may even have that effect under those conditions at the time, rather than making a movie specifically to show this technique.
View more about The Third Man reviews
