I couldn't watch it for 18 minutes. After checking it, the director is a visual effects specialist. After doing special effects for Wolverine in 2009, there has been no movement for six years? In 2015, I made special effects for a short film I had never heard of, and this year I made this debut movie.
I dragged the progress bar and scanned it. The first 80 minutes were special effects of 1999, and the last 10 minutes were the dazzling special effects of 1999. This is how my job is done, and the rest can be imagined.
Another screenwriter's resume of this film is very similar to that of the director. After writing a "Terrorist Alien Invasion Alien Raiders" in 2008, I didn't know what to do until I wrote this this year.
How to say, who is so bold to invest in this film?
The following is an excerpt from the IMDb film review, there are currently 8 in total.
1/10 ridiculous, false, bad, boring story absurd. Acting fake. Rotten, last century special effects. Strawberry Jam Plasma. Boring, endless silence. can not stand it. The highlight of this crap is the half-second of silent blackout after the closing credits. If I could give zero stars, I would give zero stars.
4/10 Expanding brain stem big movie (a picture stem, a bit similar to the cover of this film, you can search it yourself) CGI gives you the feeling of a movie 20 years ago
4/10 Ugly enough Almost all acting is bad, 90% of the lines suck. With all the characters you don't care what happens to them next. The protagonist doesn't look like he should play the role. 4 stars for special effects, the movie cost is small, and some of the special effects are amazing. The ending is weird, but I can say that 5 to 10 minutes is not bad. The rest will not work. However, the first 75 minutes are hard to watch, because the movie is really boring, and the protagonist has a daughter that is annoying. Not the worst I've seen, but far from the best. Except for those 5 to 10 minutes, forget about the rest.
2/10 My brain hurts the cliché of the plot episode (this is true, including the opening credits are so fucking old-fashioned, I found out in the first minute, but the delusion survived the first act, I lost ) ... (too long to translate) I've been thinking about it for a long time and don't know who to recommend this movie to... You can't laugh at all, and you can't read the story. Best not to look at it.
7/10 $500,000 budget! Other film reviewers are right, I can't watch the first hour. But we want to encourage their tremendous effort for this original idea. Well done - maybe just may be you will touch the right people in just the right way too which they begin to understand their OWN potential.
7/10 Thanos is scum compared to this (I don't want to translate, probably saying that Thanos is scum, although the acting is pretty bad, this guy is touched by the plot and setting, considering the small cost, the original script, the top of the last century The level of special effects, and his dislike of the Women's Federation movies, he gave a score of 7.5 after some calculations, and hoped that the sequel would perform better)
10/10 I have seen one of the best movie story and pictures are fantastic. This is the next generation of superheroes. Superman's abilities are a fool compared to this. The handling of the plot is fantastic. The ending is magnificent. Hats off to everyone on the production team. Forget the bad reviews, your movies are perfect.
8/10 Not bad, very decent, if you like sci-fi, it's very different. The film review is too strict. The acting is really not good, but it is better than many movies. There are well-known actors in it, and the movie idea is very good. It's a fun viewing experience, time flies so you're enjoying the movie (not at all bro), and the ending is great. The special effects are not that bad, and the artistic style is very sophisticated outside of the budget. It is ill-considered to say that the special effects are bad. I watched it very well. I can't stand bad acting and bad script, so the movie is not that bad.
View more about Higher Power reviews
