I only watched this cartoon when I was in college, and after watching it, I kept thinking "No, no." - There is a problem with the logic of the final climax. Why not use weapons against weapons to make the atomic bomb explode in outer space? Do we love action more than brains?
We should not be advocating to think of risking ourselves when encountering an accident. This is a video for children. We should advocate using our brains, less devotion that is of little value, and cherishing life. Lenovo started, not only this cartoon, but also in many early film and television works of our country, and also promoted "Huang Jiguang's dedication". I don't mean to be timid or not to advocate loyalty and passion, but I mean that when the results of devotion may not necessarily solve the problem, we should cherish life and exert wisdom. We should do everything possible to find a way to solve the danger at a small price until it is unavoidable, and the giant in the movie can give it a try, and there will always be no mistakes if you try it. There is the possibility of success and the possibility of action. . (Haha, I found that this analysis has the flavor of deconstruction analysis of the constituent elements of tort liability, the scientific and rigorous analysis ability of legal formulas and thinking training?)
View more about The Iron Giant reviews