A friend asked whether the clone or the heroine escaped at the end of the movie, and if it was the clone, how would it explain that it let the heroine go and burned the nest. I will post the answer. The movie is said to have changed a lot from the original. Just discuss or keep the original title of this movie. This is how I understand it. The replicator just imitated at the beginning until the heroine reached out to the bomb, but at that moment there was such an intermediary, the replicator had the first interaction (transition object hahaha), so after the interaction The replicator didn't chase the heroine, because even if it was the first time chasing the heroine, it was only because of imitation, not because of chasing. After the interaction, it has a vague concept of "can not imitate", and has the possibility of action that marks the subjectivity. So whether it burns those things in order to "burn", I don't think it is necessarily, but an extension of the expression of a subject's will. Of course, this is only under the premise of the movie that it is the heroine who came out (two reminders, the first is that only the heroine knows that there is a bomb in that place and knows the purpose of the bomb. If my eyes were not deceived by the editing, then I will give the bomb to the end. Immediate run (very clear and powerful subjectivity) can only be the heroine. The second is an explanatory reminder, that is, the heroine was not originally in the exploration team, but she strongly requested to join, and the purpose was also for her beloved husband. From a doctor of cancer to a rowing woman in the middle chatting with the heroine (two people died, one was me and the other was my daughter) to an alcoholic woman (who applied for a social worker and was selected here) to a nihilistic woman with high IQ (all of a sudden she knew that she could not face The third way of confrontation is to quickly turn into a plant by one's own will, which is very high-knowledge and nihilistic initiative) and then the heroine was shocked later "why did the husband choose a mortal task" and so on.. You can know that the heroine in this comparison is It is the only "exception" in the exploration action. It is not to seek nihilism but to survive (seeing defects in genes, seeing the vitality of division and differentiation, and even thinking of the possibility of eternal youth). The heroine with a strong will to survive, Escape is very reasonable. In fact, from the point of view of the movie alone, there are many places that emphasize various forms of life and death, and some of them are even too deliberate. Everyone thinks that the realm where there is no return is the realm of death, but those who survive can come out Yes, life and death are in the mind, which is a kind of conceptual nothingness; blurring life and death into a plant can also be achieved in one thought, which is the realization of nothingness. The title of the film, from the etymological prefix and suffix, means this.
View more about Annihilation reviews
