"Victorius" is obviously the best, streamlined, ingenious, and almost seamless. It is rich, deep, and specific. I am very passionate about philosophy and psychology. Therefore, as far as psychology is concerned, he has done his best to visualize the psychological words and deeds of characters, and deeply integrates into the depth of love. (1) First of all, love can describe women like this: Women are born liars When they deal with men with a certain purpose, men are irresistible. Especially, when a woman is in love, her reservedness, dignity, and sanity are all gone, how she (how will) step by step to compromise with love, and step by step toward the cliff of love (set by men). Man part: Men always have an irresistible affection for mysterious and affectionate women, especially when women need help, but once a man gets a woman, his heart will gradually be controlled by reason, and the mystery of woman is not there. And love will also be replaced (can be anything). To summarize (mostly) the love of men and women: When a man is crazy, a woman is sensible; when a woman is mad, a man is sensible. (2) The suspenseful rhythm can be described as how clever, accurate, precise, and fascinating is the rhythm that can be controlled to make it possible for the audience to watch the movie, and the aftertaste is endless. This is the perfect example of watching the last 50 minutes of this movie. There is no doubt that in this last part, 100 points is not too much, I even think it is far from enough. But what I have to say is that the first 70 minutes, the lengthy preparation (although it aggravated the male protagonist’s psychological performance), is very cumbersome, and there are pros and cons. The advantage is that the richer the foreshadowing, the more beneficial it will be for the development of the later story (it will not happen-the plot is not explained enough, leading to inexplicable development problems in the later story). The disadvantage is that the content of the first half of the film is relatively vague, which greatly tests the patience of the audience. To be honest, the only flaw in the film is the length of the first half. I think it can be subtracted appropriately. In the first half, he scored 80 points. It can be said that more than 70 minutes before the sacrifice, it finally fulfilled the exquisiteness of the next fifty minutes. (3) Psychology is a genius in psychology. There is no doubt about this. I even think that he is better than Ingmar Bergman and others in the concrete control and presentation of psychology. Actors are also master actors, but every masterpiece is inseparable from the actor's own understanding and acting talents. Obviously, these two actors, especially the actress Kim Novak, treat women (how to deceive and create lies? Falling in love? How to lose self and persistence step by step in the temptation of love, and finally the expression of fear after the lie was dismantled, but still moths to the fire begging for forgiveness), it was so amazing that I fell into the ground. When performance and psychology merge, the director needs to make macro-control, and the actors to make concrete and detailed expressions. This is the decisive factor in determining the performance of the film. (4) Score the actor’s performance ability, 100 points for the director’s control ability, 100 points for the overall story 95 points (90 points for the first half, 100 points for the second half), 95 points for lines, 100 points for rhythm, 100 points for love (male and female), 100 points for shots 95 points for language (rich, precise, profound, blank) Finally, to the master, if you know how the movie will go next, it is obviously a failure of the movie. Overall score between 95/100 points
View more about Vertigo reviews
