Comment on "First Blood 4": the effective use of white lotus
By the time the fourth film of the "First Blood" series was filmed, Stallone's Rambo had evolved into a Super Saiyan with deep merit and fame.
The first part of the movie said: Several American humanitarian enthusiasts, shouldering the mission of saving thousands of people from water and fire, came to the "distressed" war-torn areas of Myanmar to engage in humanitarianism, such as running a class to educate children, and for example, to local people. Carry out medical treatment, and by the way, spread the gospel of God in Christianity or something.
If you want to go to the "hot water" place, you need to take a boat. When I ask, the boss of the boat who dares to go this waterway is the only one left, so the female humanitarian enthusiasts are moved by the old Shi Xiaozhi. , After a moral offensive, Lao Shi couldn't bear it, so he went. Note: The film has not shown any violent scenes until this point. It is not wrong to save people. If someone is morally offensive to you, and moral kidnapping is not kidnapping, it will be more or less false. So, when nothing concrete has happened, that is, when nothing has happened, the white lotus is effective.
In the second part of the movie, Lao Shi's boat with several humanitarian enthusiasts was stopped by river thieves. The river thieves wanted to take the money from everyone on the boat. After finding that there was a big American girl on the boat, they added I want the condition of the American girl on the boat. Lao Shi insisted on giving the money and not the big girl, but the river thief insisted that both the money and the big girl should be given. The two sides did not reach an agreement, and Lao Shi took out a gun and wiped out the gang of river thieves. At this time, the husband of the American girl, another humanitarian lover, jumped up in anger from the state of being held hostage while squatting and holding his head, and shouted at Lao Shi, who killed the river thief, accusing Lao Shi that he should not kill. wrong. After Lao Shi said not to kill, the river thieves would kill all their men and gang-rape the American girl to death, the girl's husband still insisted that he should not kill.
But after a shootout, the big girl's husband was still scared after all, worried that he would encounter danger if he went further, so he planned to go back. At this time, the American girl who was the fuse of the group extermination incident stood up and said that the "distressed situation" over there needed them, and she had made a commitment in advance, so she had to go, and then she went. Here, in the specific situation, it is not suitable for the white lotus, or, considering the results, when the white lotus is obviously wrong, the big girl's husband's accusation against Lao Shi can still maintain momentum, and Lao Shi is still under pressure. I explained my murder, and the white lotus still played a role. The big girl's husband decided to move forward even though he knew that there was danger and he was already cowardly, and also verified the situation of "wrong and useful".
In the third part of the movie, humanitarian enthusiasts are teaching children about medical missions, etc. When the evil forces slaughtered the village, several people were caught in the evil forces' camp and held hostage. Then came the climax of the action movie. After a few friendly exchanges with Lao Shi, a group of people, led by Lao Shi, went to the camp of the evil forces to rescue the few humanitarian enthusiasts. During this process, the humanitarian enthusiasts died, leaving Da Niu and her husband, and a group of special forces who rescued people also died. The enemy soldier who passed in front of him killed a special soldier who rescued him. Finally, he got up in anger and killed the enemy soldier who killed the special soldier. This process shows that when a white lotus flower causes someone to die because of the white lotus flower, and later appears by overcoming the white lotus flower, in both processes, he is on the moral high ground, not killing people. The logic of killing, for the sake of others, altruism, is still on the moral high ground. Therefore, the white lotus from the white lotus to the overcoming of the white lotus is still valid, although it is someone else who pays the price.
If you simply consider it from the point of view of the use effect, the white lotus flower is generally effective regardless of the occasion and specific situation. Even if you are annoying him, even if you think it is ridiculous, it seems that it is still difficult to refute. Even trying to refute it seems to require an amoral or anti-moral approach. Just like the case of Deadpool killing the villain at the end of the movie "Deadpool".
If you want to consider the white lotus problem from the perspective of right and wrong, the first difficulty you will encounter is that your standards of right and wrong are different. What you're talking about right or wrong may be consequentialist, or die or rape if you don't kill the river robber. What he wants to say is right or wrong, but it transcends the result. He shouldn't kill anyone, and he shouldn't kill anyone at any time. Consequentialism, to put it bluntly, is to value the result, but the result is a picture, and it is morally short again. Small truths die in front of big truths.
But the white lotus is definitely not useless. Our world needs the white lotus. No matter how much thieves can steal, few educate children that you want to steal, that stealing is convenient and fast, and most of them teach children to work hard and rely on their own hands. No matter how tricky a liar can be, few will say that you are going to deceive when educating children. It is easy to deceive. Most of them teach children to be honest and rely on their own abilities. When the white lotus is done, it is Kant's absolute law, the moral law in the heart, and it is like the starry sky above our head, which is worthy of our awe. They are the normative rules (also translated as adjustment rules) that Kant called them. They do not provide specific manuals on how to live. They tell us which direction to work hard and in which direction to live.
View more about Rambo reviews
