to dark. There is no light in the fire of war. The biggest expectation and worry when choosing this film was Churchill's speech. Whether the real soul itself is interesting or not directly determines the overall level of excellence. Luckily it didn't disappoint us boring spectators. Speaking of Churchill's prime minister's early days, the progression of the plot is naturally a struggle with Chamberlain's appeasement. Struggle, inaccurate, struggle. Struggling to choose in a brief battle of comfort and unknown but 80% demise. The details are handled ingeniously, and for a few scenes of daily life, the side of Churchill's strange old man is portrayed. Looking at this unquestionably great man now, although he is a great man abandoned by a great nation, no matter what angle he looks at, his sense of war and speech skills are unparalleled and excellent. The colors are not clear and the rhythm is too fast, but it is strange to be clear in World War II... There are several shots that freeze in my mind, and Churchill's two V's are naturally not to be mentioned. However, in this film, which is not aimed at war shots, The look of the officer who went to take a thousand lives to drag time finally looked at the sky was really brilliant. die without speaking. The whole article is intricately detailed, and the emotional grasp can be called perfect, and the small foreshadowing is also very colorful. As for the speech that I have read in Chinese many times, I think it is about Churchill that year, and that's it. I think someone will always use it to combine Dunkirk, but the first one in my heart is actually George VI in another movie, "The King's Speech", not impassioned, not as dark as World War II should be, but different taste. The core point of the struggle before the negotiation was naturally enough to make a lot of tears, at least the five little girls in my scene all cried... Appeasement or bloody battles are all for the good of the people. One is thinking about the self-cultivation after respite, and it is good to die less. The other is to fight to death for everyone in the future. It is true that there is a lot on the top of the hall, but when the most basic and relatively ignorant people have little knowledge of the truth, the choices they make do not seem ignorant. When future generations look at the ancestors, it seems that all mistakes are stupid, but after all, some of the few lines of history are invisible, and there are hundreds of millions of people in a country. Who knows how the wheel of history rolls past. So there is a backbone and a backbone. "When the German planes fly into the sky one day, what will you do?" "Use everything you can to fight them." "If we have a chance to talk to Hitler, talk about peace, we will remain absolutely neutral, They recognize our freedom and independence, what do you do?" "Never." Perhaps the general public, like us, is not worth mentioning, but there is something in the bones. These are the things that support our rebirth from destruction to destruction. In the peace of the Southern Song Dynasty, there was a recuperation of singing and dancing, a life under the iron hoof, and it was embarrassing, and it was not stolen for a few years. When "Never" is not an answer to a temptation but a promise, the direction of the war is no longer a simple battlefield. We are very afraid of death, but sometimes we will not be afraid of death, at least, when the country is broken, when the "peace talks", when the spine is broken, we will be low-pitched, high-pitched, or plain.
"no way."
View more about Darkest Hour reviews
