A large-scale fan movie with a script typed out by an orangutan at the printer

Briana 2022-03-21 09:01:38

This is a utterly crappy film. The director had never read the original book at all, and then made a large-scale fan film. Murder on the Orient Express was the first detective novel I read. Because of this novel, I fell in love with detective novels. This is also a special detective novel. Poirot tells us in the book, "Usually there are 12 people, and there is only one murderer. Here, there are twelve people, and there is only one innocent." What is the essence of this novel? 12 ordinary people, for justice, kill a beast. They are not vicious, they are not murderous without blinking an eye. Just for justice to be done, for kids like little Daisy. So they killed the beast with their own hands. At the same time, because they are ordinary people, they did not assign a certain person to kill the beast. They "passed through Mrs. Hubbard's room one by one in the dark and stabbed Ratchett." No one knew which knife killed Ratchett, no one knew who the executioner was, no one would be killed for Beast and psychologically burdened. When the train stopped, they would get off and disappear into the crowd. Just as they were. This is the essence of the original. They are ordinary people. Forced to organize and kill the beast. They don't know who killed Ratchett. They are not responsible for the death of the beast. I've seen two versions of Murder on the Orient Express, and unfortunately, neither of the murders was filmed well. The last one was Mrs. Hubbard lighting a blue light and watching a man enter the car and stab Ratchett. They are ordinary people, law-abiding citizens! Everyone went in and stabbed Ratchett so that no one knew who killed him. How could Mrs Hubbard stare! This one is almost bullshit. A group goes in together and kills Ratchett. Oh my god! Let's not talk about why these law-abiding citizens are so adept at killing people - Ratchett is awake here - can that train compartment fit in so many people? McQueen is still so fat! McQueen, the original said he was a "pleasant lad". He is fatter than me in this one. I was annoying enough, and the director made him drink too much. Not to mention alcoholism, he also arranged for him to make false accounts. Every new doubt in the original book was to whitewash someone, and Fat Poirot suspected that "small, dark-faced, talking like a woman" person. This is good, McQueen made false accounts, and all doubts immediately pointed to him. Removed the Greek doctor and combined him with the British colonel. This adaptation is even worse. The original text has repeatedly appeared "The jury has 12 people, and there are 12 passengers in the car." Why? Ratchett escaped the law, and the 12 law-abiding citizens wanted him to be punished. They formed a jury and they found Ratchett is guilty. At the end of the original book, in fact, the Greek doctor and Mr. Bouc also formed a temporary jury, and Poirot was just a judge. "Not guilty, Your Honor," when he asked the jury. Remove the Greek doctor and leave Bowker alone, and it's a classic detective-assistant routine. The worst is Mrs Hubbard. In the original book, she was "a true artist." "A pudgy, slightly ridiculous American mother" but also because her handbag leaked. She repeatedly showed "my daughter" and "two ugly children." "My grandson, aren't they cute?" Why? Because of her daughter, and two grandchildren, because of Ratchett all died! Changed this plot, Mrs. Hubbard has been married to several husbands and has a small amount of money because of her inheritance. This screenwriter is probably a gorilla typing randomly at the typewriter! As for the other characters, I'm too lazy to talk about it. Anyway, Poirot can let people shoot him with guns. What else can't be done? Oh yes, Poirot had a girlfriend and took her picture with him. There is such a crap in the world! In the end, everyone was in the tunnel, posing like a Last Supper. Maybe some people will think it's good, but this is Poirot, he can't preach. He also doesn't know how to preach the gospel. He only mentioned two possibilities. After listening to the jury's opinion, he "resigned with the honor." Unable to organize. stance. Maybe some people will think it's good, but this is Poirot, he can't preach. He also doesn't know how to preach the gospel. He only mentioned two possibilities. After listening to the jury's opinion, he "resigned with the honor." Unable to organize. stance. Maybe some people will think it's good, but this is Poirot, he can't preach. He also doesn't know how to preach the gospel. He only mentioned two possibilities. After listening to the jury's opinion, he "resigned with the honor." Unable to organize.

I am watching! What's this? A big fan movie? Where did black people come from? The old-fashioned British colonel turned black? Still a doctor? McQueen, "Pleasant Boy" is fatter than me, and I'm obnoxious enough. Mrs. Hubbard, gosh, I made her bad enough in the last version of the movie, and this one looks worse. Just when Poirot said, "I don't like your respectable face." However, Poirot would not speak in that manner. Not with such a sudden deep look. He would say such a thing politely. The woman in the silk dragon pajamas disappeared at the end of the aisle, not ran to the end of the aisle. Poirot also took time to get up. Did the woman wait at the door until Poirot got up before running? The film combines a British colonel and a Greek doctor into one. Great. What's even more powerful is that it took less than a minute to check the body, know what time of death, and saw a lot of knives. The most powerful thing is that the Greek doctor in the original book engages in extramarital affairs, while the British colonel is very loyal. The strange thing is that when I read Murder on the Orient Express (I read the first detective novel), I thought the Greek doctor was black (he was described as dark skinned), but this is the same character as I imagined. Poirot also climbed onto the train, which was beside the abyss. It must be Hercules, not the one with the little grey cells. My own mother! The burning debris is what the murderer really wanted to destroy. Burned carefully (because it will expose them), have you ever seen a piece the size of a palm left? Swedish women don't look like sheep. Duchess of Russia, what kind of princess is this talking about. She is picky, not finding fault. It was filmed as a tragedy on the Nile. To drink coffee in the snow, Mr. Poirot has special requirements for the temperature of the coffee, and he will never drink coffee in the snow. What a surprise, the black doctor shot someone. Has the director ever read the original?

View more about Murder on the Orient Express reviews

Extended Reading

Murder on the Orient Express quotes

  • British Military Escort: How did you know it was him, sir? From just a tiny crack on the wall?

    Hercule Poirot: I have the advantage. I can only see the world as it should be. And when it is not the imperfection stands out like the nose in the middle of a face. It... it makes most of life unbearable, but it is useful in the detection of crime.

    British Military Escort: But it's as though you see into their hearts and divine their true natures.

    Hercule Poirot: And whatever people say, there is right, there is wrong. There is nothing in between.

  • Hercule Poirot: Whatever people say, there is right. There is wrong. There is nothing in-between.