The viewing experience is very bad, I don't like this masterpiece

Camylle 2022-03-22 09:01:33

"From the viewing point of view, I don't particularly like the new film "Mind Hunter". The narrative pace is too slow, one episode is too long, the first episode has a lot of things, the male protagonist has a girlfriend, and the male protagonist is frustrated in class. The male protagonist communicates with others, the male protagonist wants to learn new things... A lot of things are mixed together, but there is no clear context or clear character, which gave me a very bad experience watching the movie. It's a bit of an urge to quit the show. But given its reputation, I'll stick with it until episode 2. The conversation with Ed in episode 2 got me a little bit interested in it. If this is the beginning of a nascent research, then I am willing to continue watching it amicably. But what the hell is the character Bill that came out? I started to think he was a leading figure like Gideon in "Criminal Minds", but he started to oppose the male protagonist's research all the time; I I thought that he was a stubborn character who would be persuaded by the male protagonist or something, but inexplicably agreed to the male protagonist and did research together with the male protagonist. To be honest, every time Bill talks to himself, it really annoys me. , as your parents say to you: "It's wrong not to do this. "But I don't think it's wrong. . "It's wrong, you think it's good, right?" I said it was wrong! "But I think so. . . "It's nothing but, you don't know anything, I eat more salt than you eat rice, I've seen it a lot, it must be wrong! ""Ok. . "Especially the frowning and aggrieved expression every time the male protagonist can't speak to him, I really don't know what he thinks in his heart. You say he compromised, then he is still stubborn; you say he didn't compromise, then What the hell is that aggrieved expression? Especially since he often doesn't explain what he thinks later, it makes me feel that this pair of partners is about the big brother and the younger brother. , after listening to it, it makes sense, but I definitely don't feel wrong. I don't know if it's because I've watched too many characters in Japanese comics. I prefer male protagonists who have their own independent ideas and the courage to express them. The male lead's performance always gives me a kind of "Bill said..." , "My girlfriend said..." "The professor said..." To be honest, for this kind of male lead. . . I really don't catch a cold. Now that I've watched episode 5, that feeling is back. The same is interrogating the prisoner. The elder brother said he was pretending, and the younger brother said oh. . . . Then what? There is always a little brother's submissive feeling, which makes people feel really uncomfortable. I think Bill is just as arbitrary as Rossi who just arrived in the third season, but the male protagonist can't refute him like Aaron, the problem is that the main theme of the main line gives me a feeling that it should be to show that "the male protagonist is correct and innovative. "The feeling makes me very puzzled and really uncomfortable. I know I didn't study this professionally, and I didn't work in the FBI. All my relevant knowledge comes from American TV shows, but the process of confronting criminals, whether it is a dialogue with an arrested serial killer or a suspected suspect , the male protagonist asked, is what he said true, and are his words credible? Is this asking me? Is this to ask the audience? It is true that this is a way to cause the audience to think, but as an FBI, with years of practical experience, you and I, who have never done it before, are asking the same question? That really doesn't consider using your experience, even if you give an experience like Bill did and then lead me to think about whether it is correct or not, and then guide me? You are as confused as me, how can I believe you can find the answer? It's really the same world, the same dream. To be honest, it's been five episodes, I've watched five episodes, and I still don't know what the male lead is called. . . ——These are my thoughts after watching five episodes. This drama finally forced me away in episode 8. Maybe it's because I've watched too much "Criminal Minds", and when I see the existence of a Bill who doesn't know the meaning of existence at all, it really drives me crazy. I don't know what the point of this character's existence is. Theoretical theory is disdainful, and the doctor asked him to use the investigative report written with the theory to roll up his sleeves and fight with others. Every day, he took his old qualifications from the past few decades and said to others, "I am right, you are "Wrong" (whether to the male lead or to the doctor), you can't separate personal feelings from work, say at home, look at how difficult my work is, but I can't do it at home; at the FBI, say, look at how difficult my work is at home, and I can't do it at home . One second before, he said that this man likes high heels is a pervert. The doctor also advised him that not all transvestites kill people. The next second, he met a perverted principal who touched children's feet every day and said it was not a big deal. WTF? This double standard is also possible. The white male chauvinism all day long, at home, at work, and at work, without seeing his role in promoting the plot, and it's annoying. The groping interest is exhausted a little bit. Another point is that the filming of this drama is too jumpy, often one second at work and the next second at home. When I thought that the male lead and female lead's play was going to take over the previous plot and connect the back, I suddenly told me that this was a sex scene, just to sell meat; when I just watched it as a welfare, I suddenly "Oh, it has something to do with the plot. "; when I think about what it has to do with the plot. . . . There was no omen in the back to remind me what the male protagonist was thinking about in the deep thinking of the sex scene with the female protagonist. . . This sense of discord appears too much in the play, including Bill's family problems, the doctor feeding the cat, and the encounter and acquaintance between the male and female protagonists, always giving me a feeling that "the existence of this character has a positive effect on the plot." It's a driving force, but I feel like I've watched so many episodes and it's useless." You say it's a simple daily life, but some details will make you feel that this is not a daily life. You say it's not a daily life, but you will not mention the place where you don't know if it is a foreshadowing. It makes me feel extremely uncomfortable. It's like the second shoe you've been waiting for, and it's never going to hit the ground.

View more about Mindhunter reviews

Related Articles