If there are three men in a show, and one partner is counted as one, then four.
My brother is a typical perverted personality. .
He killed his father by mistake when he was a teenager, and robbed his criminal record many times. This setting basically limited his "bad guy" status. But in the whole film, I don't seem to think that he is very different from other people. Everyone has their own ideas, but his external performance is out of line. Of course, this is directly related to the overall atmosphere in the west.
Even a waiter can treat customers like a jerk. No wonder the business is not good. The younger brother has a more complex and multi-faceted personality. In general, he is restrained, stable and mature. , Kind, but there is always a reason for divorce. The idea and plan of robbery and crime are also his idea. There is also a small clip, that is, he "killed" the little hooligan who was rude to his brother, this Nima , The inherent adventurous spirit and violent tendencies are definitely a family with my brother...
In contrast, the two old police officers are instead funny and responsible, a cold joke, various politically incorrect ideas, and ethnic issues. All can be used to ridicule, such open-mindedness and even leisure, I am afraid that it is only the
old man who is about to retire~ The background pattern of the film is actually obvious, but the director is very NB. He did not tell you directly, but in In the various shots, the feeling of vicissitudes and dilapidation permeates, coupled with occasional dialogue mentions, a picture of the traditional economic decline of the western United States and the opening of the oil industry is in sight. And as for how the bank harms the property of ordinary people, it is also highlighted by people's complaints, and they did not write the truth to me, which is also the embodiment of the movie's profound skills.
The end result is actually reasonable, but a bit unexpected.
Because all along, the brothers robbed the bank with the sturdiness and ridicule of the people in the west, so when I watched the movie, I really didn't think that robbing a bank was a big crime, and more importantly, no one died. Therefore, it is taken for granted that the work is finished and the feelings of western cowboys will stop there, and the brothers will move towards a new life in the future.
But there is one thing, robbing a bank, as I said at the beginning, is not a way to go back.
In the end, there is always something left for this, and it doesn't really matter who it is. The elder brother died, the younger brother returned to the family, the younger brother died, the elder brother took care of the family on his behalf, the policeman died, and the other mourned.
As the last victim, my brother was a relief. He followed his inner guidance. As the king of the plain, he was not at a disadvantage against many police officers. He was forced to kill when he robbed a bank, but in his eyes, his life was just as fleeting as the lives of others. Your death is my death, there is no moral judgment between life and death, there is only immediate choice. Kill a police officer, complete a career achievement, and then be killed, and get out of this sea of misery. It stands to reason that his death should be just and moral, but in the West, everyone doesn't feel that way.
The Indian police officer is indeed a bit regrettable. He has been in the military all his life, but he quickly won the lunch in the confrontation. This is exactly what the film reflects, how small life is in the vast western world.
As for the remaining younger brother and the old police officer, along with the collapse and separation of the past world, facing the establishment of a new and unfamiliar world, they may establish a new bond with each other through their guilt and cherish the past together. to the future.
View more about Hell or High Water reviews
