But the second one really made me discover what's innovative about the series. This time, the film pays homage to Bond in terms of rhythm and plot (for example, it is a major action scene at the beginning, and the middle set of information depends entirely on male charm and must be played all over the world), but it shows its own characteristics in every corner. Whether it's cartoon-like scenes, more imaginative characters, ingenious props that inherit the advantages of the previous episode, or smooth and shrewd actions from beginning to end, they are all eye-catching. And all this is due to the fact that the film no longer superficially attacked the original classic frame, but played a new height on the basis of the original frame, and innovation sometimes requires compromise.
The second work allowed me to see the original Matthew, the Matthew who was good at telling stories. No matter how classic (routine) stories were, they could always tell something new in his hands. If you like King Kipian, if you like the first lesson of X-Men, then please go into the theater happily, the movie will not let you down!
ps After watching the movie, my partner said that the villain in this episode is wonderful, but the idea is not high, and it seems that it is not as extreme and idealistic as the villain of Samuel Jackson. But I think that the most vulgar people do the craziest things, which in itself is an anti-routine. Moreover, this villain setting even reminds me of Goldfinger... alas, how much I love 007
View more about Kingsman: The Golden Circle reviews