The movie is basically in the same direction as the novel, and many details have been changed during the period. As for whether Rachel drinks gin with can or vodka with water bottle, I don't really care. The most tangled thing is that London has become New York and everyone has come and gone from start to finish. It's a good gentleman's British style! >
terms of progress, there is a common problem with most movies, the plot is not very coherent, and the audience needs to make up for it. The character creation is not full enough, and some behaviors are a bit baffling. The first 50% of the novel is mostly foreshadowing and background description. The movie compresses this 50% to less than 20% of the length and the description part is also concentrated in the second half and is often omitted. The three-person diary form with a chaotic time line was retained in the first half. The result is that the first half is inexplicable and unintelligible, and the second half of the audience may not be able to digest the huge amount of information. I dare say that for most people who don't know the story, it's really not easy to keep reading the first half of the story. Anyway, when Mrs. Bi saw half of it, the faces of the three women could not be distinguished. Oh yes, this film is very good-looking, except for the second male who doesn't quite fit the image of the novel and the female police officer who combines the two in the novel and only retains the annoying attributes, everyone else is very beautiful!
The IMDB score is 6.5, which is estimated to be the case. If it is not supported by fans of the original book, it is estimated that even this score will not be reached.
Phew, after six months, I can finally open a new book! If you don’t read it and don’t open a new one, it’s also a disease. You have to change it!
View more about The Girl on the Train reviews
