- The two of them are indeed in love. But each has their own insurmountable desires.
--The girl who started the pen is a necrophile and the boy is a slave and bisexual.
--The boy killed No. 2 because the girl asked him to do it, but the anger at the moment of killing him came from double jealousy, jealous that No. 2 could have sex with a girl, and jealous that the girl got another boy's No. 2.
--Because it was marked as a homosexual film. I thought the uncle was one of the protagonists, but it wasn't, he was just a driving character, he was the No. 2 from the boy's desire side, and the previous Say was the No. 2 of the woman. The film is still dominated by men and women.
--The main scene is the cabin in the woods. After quoting the director's explanation, this is a candy house that satisfies your desires. Then the encounter between the two in the play clearly shows the desires of both sides. The girl is necrophilic and obsessed with Say's body. So was imprisoned with his body. Boys' desires are dominated by domesticated and male desires. So he was tied by a hunter with a dog leash and forcibly had sex, and got the first climax of his life.
--When they left, both of their desires were satisfied, and they both knew their deepest desires. The girl wants to kill the hunter because she accepts her own desire to kill, and the boy stops her because she accepts the desire for her own homosexuality.
- So are they both in love? The answer is yes.
--Their first successful union after that was because they accepted their own desires. I also understand the ending to which this desire is directed. The girl took the gun because the director emphasized that she was responsible for the murder, and being killed by the police was the result of her satisfying her desire through murder. The boy pleaded for the hunter because he accepted his homosexual orientation, and was injured, arrested and imprisoned as an ending after he blindly obeyed the order and killed himself.
--I think the film's metaphors and outline appeals have caused the story to wander a bit. The metaphors are clearly explained, but the simple plot is distracted. The main reason is that the two fall in love with each other. I can't understand it. If the boy is not bisexual but gay in the end, he does not love the girl, he accepts himself in the process and falls in love with the hunter, and the girl does not love the boy, but it is more appropriate to simply use him as a tool to satisfy his own desires . But in this way, the plot is not so weird. The director probably wants to be more alternative and extreme. -- It can be said that it is very strange indeed.
View more about Criminal Lovers reviews
