King Arthur: Guy Ritchie's starting point is too high, so people's requirements for him are always in the age of two big smoking guns. However, just like cheating, this kind of magic is the result of a sudden deal with Satan. So far, we are not satisfied with the works of the study level, because he is the originator of multi-line narrative that no one has surpassed. But there are only a few of all human beings in the temple of the god of craftsmanship, Nolan, Quentin, MacDonald, the most commendable is that they are pure in their bones and not literary. Just like taking drugs to hurt his body, he has to slow down, but the genius is slow to make us so lonely, so from the great detective Sherlock Holmes and the secret agent, Lao Gai is more of a side ball, occasionally showing off his skills, but the overall is still tepid. of storytelling. When it comes to "King Arthur", there is a classic theme. Although it is a linear narrative, the familiar impulse to take off and eager to try in the interlude leaps to the screen, playing with the timeline in minutes. As an advertising director, don't pretend to play with the camera if you don't have half of Guy Ritchie, and tell the story well, even Guy Ritchie is actually narrating it well. But we are so dissatisfied, the subversion of the whole story is only in form and vision, and the story is told so well, it is so lonely. So as a whole, the content of this story is nothing to talk about, and the world view is sparse and ordinary, but the quality is guaranteed, and the visual, camera, and atmosphere creation are all excellent, and it feels like cutting a watermelon with a samurai knife. Looking forward to the old man returning to the black humor of multi-line narrative at the peak moment, it is really uncomfortable to scratch the itch, so you still have to do the above story line solidly, don't be lazy, God, this type, in fact, you are a dynasty alone
View more about King Arthur: Legend of the Sword reviews
