When I watched The Da Vinci Code, I was shocked. In the film, the history of the Renaissance is very well combined with the plot of the film. There are old things mixed in with each other. It seems to let people see that year. "Angels and Demons", which appeared as a prequel, is also in place. But most of the credit should go to the original author Dan Brown. I also looked for his book at school, but unfortunately I couldn't find it. At that time, I didn't have much heart to read it!
There are so few deciphered plots that should be the obvious reason for its failure. At the beginning of the film, the handling of hallucinations is too strong, and there is a feeling of dazzling skills. The overall feeling revolves around Professor Langdon's own clues, weighing on the puzzle. We're a good cut to see Dan Brown's puzzles!
I haven't read Dan Brown's original book, but this film doesn't do a good job of "detonating the virus". Forced to destroy the world, the power of the villain organization is a bit weak!
The last mouth escape to save the world is my heartache. When deciphering suspense movies begin to evade, what is the significance of this movie!
Ps Tom Hanks doesn't have the wisdom of the "Da Vinci Code" period. Is it because of gaining weight?
View more about Inferno reviews
