For example, in the Indian environment, women have 10% of the rights and men have 90% of the rights. This movie jumps out and declares that this is not right, two women and eight men, but in fact, China has reached the level of four women and six men. , to see this movie with our eyes is a kind of backwardness and retrogression.
There are also those who say that the film should be viewed in the context of India, so I will ask, why should we consider things from the perspective of others?
To put it a bit bigger, shouldn't any foreign things be combined with the national conditions, get rid of the dross, and take the essence for your own use? Since there is no reference value for myself, it is difficult for me to have a high evaluation of it.
Do you want to evaluate those militaristic things in the context of Japan?
An "advanced" enterprise in a poor county relocates to Shanghai, can you still give it the title of "advanced"?
The father planned his daughter's life in an extremely brutal way. The daughter had no choice but to obey. The spirit of sports competition was also distorted into a utilitarian "win". It is hard to believe that such a film would receive so many applause.
Going back 10,000 steps, regardless of the values, it is just a mediocre inspirational film, and a score of 9.2 is too good. Originally wanted to give 2-3 stars, and 1 star was to balance the artificially high score.
View more about Dangal reviews