I just want to know: Why is there a problem in the comments that the three stories of this movie are not coherent? Since it is said that there are three stories, why must there be a special connection? (Is it just because the first part has a strong continuity, so the second part should be the same?) (The second part is the same as the first part in many aspects, but the comments say there is nothing new, the story is old-fashioned or something : What you've seen is old, what you haven't seen is novel?) (............) (......... ....)
View more about Sin City: A Dame to Kill For reviews
