To be honest, "Flying Tigers of the Railway" is still a good movie in terms of the movie. The movie begins with seeing the train through the eyes of a child, and then goes back to 1941, the war-torn era. However, when the film begins to describe the "Flying Tigers" led by Ma Yuan who jumped into a civilian train, then beat and stripped the Japanese, it was funny (because the scene was funny) and a little sad. In recent years, not only funny-style films like "Flying Tigers on the Railroad" are weakening the Japanese invaders, but even anti-Japanese films like "Bright Sword" are weakening the Japanese army. Is this really good? ? Isn't this disguised as conveying the wrong history to our descendants?
Besides, I really don't understand why, as a railway flying tiger, why do you want to get on a civilian train, and you didn't kill a Japanese when you got on the train, so tell me why they got on the train? Just to tell the Japanese that you exist?
Of course, the funny style of the second half of the film is not the same as the first half of the movie. Let's be a little more sentimental and pay tribute to the people who lived in that era. It also shows the righteousness of the little people of that era in the face of invaders and foreign enemies.
However, I personally think that this kind of funny movie in a way of weakening the Japanese should not be made too much, it will affect the children's wrong understanding of that period of history. If the Japanese have been weakened like this in film and television dramas, how many people will still remember the tragic eight years of the Anti-Japanese War?
Although I appreciate that Jackie Chan is still in his 60s, he still shoots action scenes in person, and I admire his dedication, but I really hope that I can respect history and restore the most authentic history of the Anti-Japanese War to the public.
View more about Railroad Tigers reviews
