The most exciting part of the movie is the final debate. The male protagonist did not betray his "friend" in the end, and finally became a hero. But is this really good in real life? Let's see what his classmates have done, and such excessive things will not be punished, okay? Looking at their attitude towards the male protagonist, are they really friends?
I feel like the main line idea of the film was problematic from the very beginning. Of course, according to Frank's words, it is true that Simon did not betray others, he is very honorable. But what about events? The students teased the principal, and still in such an outrageous way. Those students who use their money to play pranks without fear, should they really be sheltered?
Let's look at society again. How many sun exposure, exposed crimes are not exposed in court? Because no one is reporting. The film forcibly confuses whistleblower and whistleblower, making whistleblower as shameful and lowly as whistleblower.
Is it because you're not the headmaster who was teased, you don't think it's a big deal? But if one day you are bullied by others and you become that principal, you will defend your rights and seek justice for yourself. But you found that no one came forward, no one testified. Those bad people will always have a wider network than you, and officials will protect each other. You shout alone and no one responds to you. In fact, everyone knows it, but everyone doesn't want to tell the truth, and they don't want to be that traitor.
So, you're telling me that "disclosing" a crime is also a lowly act of "selling out a friend"? You want me to applaud? You tell me to protect those who are punished, and make it just and honorable for those who have been unfairly and humiliated?
Go to your fucking soul.
View more about Scent of a Woman reviews
