Inquiry Time: 23:10 on January 3, 2017 Inquiry Location: Wuxing Municipal Government Political Announcement Office Inquiry Reason: Learn about the case of "Bean" and other Internet media suspected of maliciously slandering domestic movies Inquirer: Yin Wei, Zhao Ya Recorded by: Zhao Ya Interviewee: Xu Xiaoxiang Nationality: Han Zeng Name: No Gender: Male Date of Birth: May 18, 1991 Address: No. 66, Diaomin Street, Hamisha District, Wuxing City Postcode: 100086 Occupation: Financial Industry Political appearance of practitioners: Public ID number: 514666199105187474 Tel: 0514-84147466 The inquirer informs: We are the administrative law enforcement officers of the Cultural Bureau of the Wuxing Municipal Government. This is our law enforcement certificate, please check it. Today, we are conducting an investigation in accordance with the law and understand the relevant situation. You should cooperate with the investigation, truthfully answer inquiries and provide materials, and must not refuse, obstruct, conceal or provide false information. If you think that we have an interest in this case, which may affect the fair handling of the case, you can apply to us to withdraw and explain the reasons. Are you listening? A: I heard clearly. Q: Do I apply for withdrawal? A: I do not apply for withdrawal.
Q: Is that Mr. Xu? A: Some people call me that too, but I don't think I'm the person you're looking for. Q: You don't have to be afraid, we are just asking you a few things, and we won't leave a stain on your file. A: But I see that you are using "question notes". I'm sorry, I think you should know my file. I majored in law at university, and I have had internship experience in relevant departments. I have seen this kind of transcript... Q: Then you should be more at ease. As you said, I believe you can clearly distinguish the difference between "inquiry" and "interrogation". We are just out of the need to investigate the case and want to know something about you. The meeting is understood to be, um, an "appointment". A: But I still don't understand how I can help you. Q: You must be aware of the snares that have been stabbed by the two platforms of "Bean" and "Meow's Gaze" recently, right? Answer: I heard a little.
Q: You may not know ~ but in fact, we have interviewed a lot of people like you. A: Oh, I thought I wasn't there yet, I mean, I don't have much influence at all. Q: So, you thought you could get away with it forever, didn't you? A: Getting away with impunity? I don't understand what you mean~ Q: You don't have to be nervous, we just want you to understand that even on online platforms, you need to be responsible for your words and deeds.
Answer: It is natural. Q: Very good. Mr. Xu, is your registered account on "Bean" "Xu Xiao Sample"? Answer: Yes. Q: Then your registered account on "Xiaozhong Dianping" is called "Movie Appraiser - Xu Xiaoshang", isn't it? Answer: Exactly. Q: You published a long review about "Hello, Madman" not long ago. The title was "History, This Was A Werewolf Kill", and it was shortlisted for the long review column on the homepage of the film, right? A: Yes...(so) that's why I was included in your "Observation" list, isn't it? Q: Sorry, you are not authorized to ask questions, and we are not authorized to (unauthorized) answer your questions. You just need to cooperate with our work and answer honestly, understand? Answer: I understand. Q: What were you doing when we called you? A: I just finished watching "Flying Tigers on the Railroad" in the movie theater, and I was about to go back to the office to code words. Q: Does (code word) mean writing a movie review? A: Yes, this is my hobby. Q: What do you think of this film? A: This is a fucking shit movie. Q: Please pay attention to the words. A: I'm sorry, I'm sorry.
Q: As far as I know, this is a "main theme" movie, which is very positive. Can you tell me why you don't like it? A: I personally don't like this kind of "main theme" movies very much. (I think) if a director deliberately caters to the main theme, it is bound to compromise the dynamism of artistic creation. (I think) the "main theme" that we are advocating nowadays is not very human. Q: So, do you confess to your malicious slander when you commented on domestic theme films such as "Operation Mekong"? A: What? I didn't, I didn't mean to discredit it at all. You can check, I just simply don't like the main theme movies. For Hollywood blockbusters like "Hacksaw Ridge", I only gave "Samsung", and I didn't mean anything against domestic movies. Q: But in fact, your ratings for most domestic films are relatively low. Especially the recent two films "The Great Wall" and "The Ferryman", you both gave the so-called "two-star praise" and misled other netizens in the "niche comment" movie community, inciting them not to watch. At the same time, you fabricated facts over and over again to attack a certain actress in "The Great Wall" for the purpose of grandstanding, isn't it? A: First of all, (I think) it is not the customer's responsibility for the food to go bad, and secondly, the bad food will cause diarrhea, if I have eaten it, then I will definitely not recommend this restaurant to others. , this is human nature. Q: I guess your evaluation of "Flying Tigers of the Railway" is not much better than those of these two films, is it? A: Yes, this is a "ridiculous" rotten film. It has some advantages, such as some interesting action designs. Jackie Chan successfully applied the usual "Kung Fu comedy" elements to the anti-Japanese theme, which can be regarded as a breakthrough. But its whole has been necrotic. From the plot frame to the specific details, from the line design to the actors' performance, it is very rigid, empty, and boring. Even if a certain organ is still healthy, it will not save his life. Q: (Sometimes) I really don't understand you film critics, why are you so picky when watching movies? I think this movie is really funny. For example, the fortune teller, who "scared the baby to death", can amuse me every time. A: These outdated Internet jokes are the most effective accomplices in the murder of a comedy. Like the "Westward Journey 3" in September, the forced interspersed net language stalks, like the idiom "the overlord is hard on the bow" in the composition of primary school students, did not amuse the audience, but choked to death. In particular, the fortune-teller in the film has a wrinkled face and cuteness. When he threw out this outdated joke again and again, many viewers experienced severe "physiological discomfort" reactions, mainly manifested as nausea and vomiting. Many viewers They all poured the fresh dinner they just had on their ticket stubs. Q: I think you are exaggerating, Jackie Chan's performance is still very commendable. A: The eldest brother, who is over sixty years old, is selling cuteness and treasures on the big silver screen. It looks like "Lao Lai entertaining relatives" in the Twenty-Four Filial Piety Picture. This time, it is not Lu Xun who vomited, but hundreds of millions of mainland audiences. Q: Mr. Xu, do you have any prejudice against Jackie Chan? A: On the contrary, I am a generation that really grew up watching Jackie Chan movies. Back in the days when the movie was still being shown in the Grand Theater, I would often go with my father to cheer on my eldest brother. But today's eldest brother, driven by profit, is completely different from his eyes. His ugly soul has been distorted into Picasso's abstract paintings by money and power. From the last action movie of "Zodiac" to a frequent visitor to the Lunar New Year stalls, Jackie Chan took off all his moral disguise, exposing himself to the spotlight as a villain who broke his promises. This not only disappointed the critics, but also chilled the hearts of all fans. Q: Everyone has their own difficulties. I think you should understand when you are so grown up. A: If Jackie Chan is trying to make a way out for his son, and is trying to please the government, I believe Jaycee Chan will disappoint him again. . Q: I have to remind you again, please be careful with your words, especially when you refer to the government. Answer: OK. I mean Jackie Chan is like Zhang Yimou, he has no character anymore. They used to be iron-clad spines, but now they bend like a coil of mosquito coils. Question: Are you implying your dissatisfaction with our party? A: I did not write articles to flatter the Labour Party. Q: Your words can get you into big trouble. A: Otherwise, why would I be here? Question: You are here just to reflect our tolerance and kindness to you. Please believe that we have many means to make scholars submit, but because of our tolerance, we first gave you a chance to reform, and the same is true for Jaycee Chan . A: If you are a little more tolerant and kind to Ke Zhendong, I think "Monster Hunt" should not need to be remade. Q: You are very stubborn! A: I would prefer you to call it "chun". Dare to ask what he did more than Ke Zhendong? A "principal criminal" who takes drugs by himself and allows others to use drugs is punished lighter than the "accomplice"? Is this what we call "all men are equal before the law"? Q: Please note that Jaycee Chan did not participate in the previous publicity activities, nor did he enter the list of "leading stars" and "co-stars". A: Rape the law in a bright red moral "painted skin", it's really smooth. Question: You will pay dearly for your stubbornness! A: No more than the price paid by a country's stubbornness. Question: Mr. Xu, I found that you always like to raise questions. We are only talking about movies. Why do you have to rise to the level of soul and society? A: (I think) movies are a good medicine for human beings to "dig deep into the soul", not a tool for businessmen to "gather money". Dare to ask what he did more than Ke Zhendong? A "principal criminal" who takes drugs by himself and allows others to use drugs is punished lighter than the "accomplice"? Is this what we call "all men are equal before the law"? Q: Please note that Jaycee Chan did not participate in the previous publicity activities, nor did he enter the list of "leading stars" and "co-stars". A: Rape the law in a bright red moral "painted skin", it's really smooth. Question: You will pay dearly for your stubbornness! A: No more than the price paid by a country's stubbornness. Question: Mr. Xu, I found that you always like to raise questions. We are only talking about movies. Why do you have to rise to the level of soul and society? A: (I think) movies are a good medicine for human beings to "dig deep into the soul", not a tool for businessmen to "gather money".
From "lion" to "tiger", the same story routine is the artistic stagnation; from "robbing treasure" to "exploding the bridge", the endless boring preaching is the condescension of the soul - Jackie Chan always said "less talk", did (he) really "speak less"? He just used his mouth to teach everyone how to be "submissive", and he has evolved to teach the audience how not to resist. "Teaching by example" to "teaching by example" and "educational methods" are indeed quite clever, but his flattering personality will be ridiculed by the world. Q: Saying everything, you just refuse to give "Flying Tigers on the Railroad" a high score, and are you unwilling to give domestic films a chance? A: What does not give domestic films a chance is the domestic films themselves. As for "Flying Tigers on the Railroad", I'm sorry, but it's impossible for me to give more than two stars. Q: To put it bluntly, we could easily destroy you. A: Yes, but you can't beat me after all.
Question: Are all the above facts true? A: I have read the above records, and they are the same as what I said. Interviewee: Xu Xiaosang on January 4, 2017
View more about Railroad Tigers reviews
