Humans create their own stories of class, race and discrimination

I watched it at station B , and a large red barrage flashed at the beginning.
After I stopped and watched it, I realized that
this was a comment on the world view of the whole film. The general idea is:
"Since humans despise robots,
why do they need to create robots similar to humans?
Since they have created things similar to themselves, why should they discriminate against them and feel that they are disgusting?
This is actually a contradiction of human beings.
In Before solving the problem of robots, humans should figure out what is in their hearts.”




After reading this comment, from the first shot of the film, I couldn't "take it for granted".
It can be seen that this comment is indeed the most fundamental problem of this worldview.

A humanoid robot lifts up its clothes and opens its stomach to read the data to the master
- this scene makes me very uncomfortable. Because humans created this species without giving them decent "dignity".



On TV, the public expresses wanton ridicule at the "sickness" of humans who are befriending robots
- this is what we know as discrimination.


In the classroom, the male protagonist looked at an honest-looking robot that dared not take the road of others, and when he timidly gave way,
- obviously this is what we know as "class"!


So, this is a story about us humans creating a "race" and then "discriminating" against them and classifying them as an inferior "class".

Insert a private item - this is definitely not uncommon.
There are many examples of our culture, such as "Pan Jinlian".
This is a character created by a male literati according to his own needs and preferences,
and then he will play with her, covet her according to his own preferences , and then
belittle her, vilify her, and kill her according to the needs of the ruler
.
Outside the book, while denying women's liberty of sexual desire and personal freedom according to one's own preferences, at the same time
belittling "Pan Jinlian" based on the convenience of control, using her as a chicken that has been killed for monkeys to see.
Women, even if they're just fictional characters, can be used by them to the point of scum.
Another example is that AV
actresses pose and make voices to create feelings according to the requirements of men.
I think many men think that the feelings of actresses they see are real female feelings, right?
It's definitely not that
AV actresses are not "actors" in the traditional sense. They don't participate in the creation,
but only provide the canvas and paint for creation. In
this sense, they are very loyal "humanoid robots". The private goods are over
-

this kind of discrimination can be seen everywhere in this world


Robots must hang an optoelectronic ring on their heads to distinguish them from real humans.
This setting is actually similar to "angels".
Although such angels are discriminated against in this world, this is a counter-pressure and absurd method. In this world, people who regard robots

as their real family are regarded as a kind of "robot mania"

.
The level of friends has a kind of "trust" and "sympathy" for robots that are beyond ordinary people.

If you want to discuss "the contradiction in the title is untenable, because even though the protagonist's poor robots all look exactly like humans, their expressions can also arouse human emotions. Empathy
, but not every robot is humanoid.
There are also robots in this traditional shape, but in a small proportion.”


This question is also easy to answer, because what arouses empathy and is similar to human beings is
not only appearance
, but also behavioral patterns and communication patterns
. Walking, talking, holding things the same as people,
these visible settings will make people feel Empathy is actually very easy to understand. It is not as good as the evaluation in the TV interview. It has to be interpreted as "because there are not enough human friends, so I put my emotions on robots."
Humans now have many partners from other species, such as dogs, cats, cats, horses and birds. Pets such as chameleons
can't even be pets, pandas, wolves, dolphins, whales,
as long as they're in sync with humans in some way and act by the same code -- that is, being able to "communicate"
to empathize with humans.
Humans treat them like they are. Being best friends and family members is very common and non-morbid. On the

other hand, even in the world of movies, robots with "traditional" and "classic" appearance are actually anthropomorphic.

In addition to being "visible to the naked eye",
there are Some of the mainstream humans in the protagonist's world don't know what
we'll find out when they find this "Eve's Time" coffee bar:



The rule here is that the robot can "enjoy the time to relax" without hanging around the ring
- is
it possible that this relaxation is only a human being here to find a robot to relax
? I don’t know that
the other is that the robot wants to relax here , which

means that the robot actually wants to “relax”,
and the mainstream human beings where the protagonist is actually don’t know that the robot actually wants to “relax”.
There are two layers of settings.
1 Robots have the idea of ​​autonomy
2 Humans don't know that robots have this idea

... The autonomous consciousness and ethical proposition of robots are put forward here.
I also knew from the beginning that this is another work that talks about this issue.. ...

The plot continues The male protagonist and his friends find that everyone around them may be robots and they can't tell the difference. The reaction is:
looking around seems to be extremely frightening and panic


However, although my friend just said that this is a gray area of ​​illegality, I
immediately discussed with the male protagonist not to reveal it
, as if I was a little excited to find a hidden little world~~

———
Almost the spoiler of this scene is In
fact, at this stage of the movie, I can see that the basis for human and non-human robots to have feelings is already in place.
1. Robots have their own ideas.
2. Humans can empathize with robots.
I don’t think it is strange what happens next.


If you have a little understanding of the character discourse analysis method,
you can quickly analyze the implied meaning of the character's identity, even in such a mouthful of Japanese
. who wait



{The educational role of literature and art works is undeniable and cannot be ignored.
No matter how you say art for art's sake
, literature and art can teach people how to "empathize". It is inevitable that they will be used as propaganda and political tools. .

For example, tanmei comics and novels taught most people that "love has no boundaries between genders" and
changed the entire civilization
, but most people who haven't read it still think "this is a pervert."
Once saw a girl was very angry In the middle school textbooks, "homosexuality" is listed in the same "psychopathic" category as "transvestite", etc.
She is angry only because of "homosexuality" and
feels "what happened to homosexuality?"
But she doesn't care about other "diseases". Feeling aggrieved
- I think it's because she hasn't seen other literature or film and television works about "transvestite" and so on. }


There is a major difference between the robots in this film and some other imagined ones.
Their IQs don’t seem to be very high,
and they can’t quickly analyze some things that humans can’t analyze based on big data, let alone come up with a perfect method. Rebelling against human beings and ruling over human beings
from this point of view are just middle (lower) human IQs
. The highest level they can achieve is to imitate the general behavior of human beings freely.
Let’s look at the three laws of robots . The premise of not harming human beings) 3. Protect the safety of the robot itself (the premise of not harming human beings) Obviously, the setting of this program is only the setting of a housekeeping robot, not a high-intelligence and high-tech robot.





Since we just want to create robots that can replace ordinary power, why let them have their own "ideas"? ——This may be purely a soft sci-fi bug, or it may require long-winded proofs and assumptions from the philosophy of creation, decentralized automation, and autonomous control technology,,,,,,]

In addition, the hidden rule of lying
is on the one hand Human beings have their own privacy reserved space (otherwise, robots can say everything) on ​​the
one hand, it also objectively causes humans to distrust robots,
which is fundamental to the relationship between countless masters (classes) and slaves that we have seen in history. Just the same.
The so-called "class" means that I use you to support you with a few resources and don't trust you.
——This essentially forms a relationship of "ownership" and "ownership"

Eve's Time Cafe's existence as a kind of paradise (or an enclave in parlance)
eliminates this concept of class The
male protagonist is here a second before I am very happy to be able to play with other people's robots. I don't feel infringed
. The next second I found out that my own robot also came here to "act without authorization" and
immediately became furious. "How can this be done?! She is mine... "!
This is the normal reaction when property rights are violated.
People can be friends with other robots
, but they can only see their "home" as "things".
I think this is a kind of class sequelae.

View more about Time of Eve reviews