It may also be that the preset expectations were raised a little too high. Coupled with its strong immunity to the accumulation of visual stimuli, and in an irresponsible attitude (almost no interviews, tidbits and materials), just look at it and tell me about this 5-part big ip opening work.
Yes, looking for the original author to write the script can provide high fidelity and ensure the original flavor (whether you are loyal to the original world should also be based on the successful presentation of the original world... If you fail to pass, you want to see if you are smart?).
I heard that Rowling is still very prolific and writes one version after another, and the director and screenwriters can't even see it.
I guess she has the filming experience of the previous Harry Potter series, and she should have some sophisticated experience in communicating with major film companies.
So this time the movie plot is old-fashioned, the characters are empty, the interaction is blunt, and there is nothing new in the creation of the magical world. The pot will carry 50% for her, and the remaining 50%. From the perspective of Warner’s big production, it may be the creativity of the insiders. Lack and values are too conservative to be boring (suicide squad... great angle and subject matter, shallow digging, old-fashioned mediocre conveying family atmosphere values, terrible horrible). The director is also an acquaintance, the shortcomings, I heard that it has been maintained all the way to this one.
The specific fairness and unfairness need to be verified, so this hypothesis is temporarily made.
Specifically, it is 3 points.
1 Rhythm, the heroine took the hero away after meeting the hero who was knocked down by the fat man in the alley.
Graves suddenly shouted to the hostess, Tina.... So, have they ever photographed and dragged?
The fat man found silently in the ice and snow. Of course, he planned to touch it in a routine way. Then the male lead called out a few words and left.
There are still quite a few moments, there will be inexplicable pauses in the dialogue and interaction. Usually successfully produced jokes, similar to "mdzz" with an eye, an eyebrow raised, and a mouth curled. But most of the protagonists in it are strangers, and they inexplicably convey a tacit, harmonious, and supportive attitude without knowing each other. It's strange. So obtrusive. So dissonant. So affectionate!
Could it be possible that the screenwriters of Warner's captive who are in the same stranger way (this year Warner’s accounting by the shoddy big ip looks pretty good) are already stretched and unable to have enough ability to shape each other’s distrust, but they are still stumbling. Have you hit the true feelings of fighting side by side in adversity?
2 The world
in the box. During the feeding process, by looking at the nests they fixed, several animals escaped.
So what they set is, wild animals? Does the world in the box use magic to fix the habitat of the animals in a specific area? At present, it looks more like a human zoo with cages.
The obvious feeling is that the creator does not have a complete concept, so what is presented is a piece of scattered and ununified parts.
Some evidences used to support the existence of the magical animal world, including Sudan, is Arizona the hometown of Thunderbirds? Quite inexplicable, maybe because this kind of realistic intervention doesn't have any sense of substitution.
Related is the magical world.
Although it is fictitious, there must be rules.
To be honest, I can't see who is high in magic and whether there are different genres in this movie, so I waved around and called.
I probably remember that some background knowledge introduction and the learning process of beginners of magic in the first Harry Potter book seemed to be lost in this one.
The more relevant thing is the relationship between magicians and normal humans.
Because it is a prequel, it is about a more traditional and closed era?
Or is it that the entire Harry Potter world of jkrowling is set to ignore, weaken and exclude Muggles? Because after all, the story of the magician?
Uh... Just like normal people in xmen are villains, mutants are always fighting and screaming and splitting each other?
Just like jojo who doesn't have a stand-in, watching the protagonists fight is a group of mental illness kicked and kicked by the air, spurting blood and breaking bones?
But in Naruto, there is Xiao Li who relies on physical skills to do ninjutsu.
Therefore, a bigger question is whether a fictitious world, a world that relies on the author's imagination to build a new world, needs more complete logic and operating rules.
Marvel's magician Doctor Strange also faces the same question.
I think Harry Potter with 7 original books will do quite well in this regard. But this movie hasn't seen this advantage for the time being.
Creating some magical animals does not mean presenting a wonderful magical world.
3 Characters, including the strength of character shaping and the development of character arc.
The friendship between Fatty and Newt comes from the fact that Newt’s perverse character is touched by the fat’s likable sense of humor. It’s just a silly reaction that was frightened by a magical animal)?
Fatty and the mistress sister are also in a honey relationship. It belongs to the category of "The plot requires their relationship to be very special but does not show the beauty and specialness. Let’s just do it first." Let’s just say that the female mistress has no prejudice against Muggles, so she was also the first to come into contact with the Muggles. Attracted by melons (why specifically, there is no get...).
The male lead and the female lead seem to have not found a suitable acting method. The encounter is obviously very strange, but the heroine's lines are presupposed to skip the process from strange to familiar.
The male protagonist also did not do serious things, and ran away with the little hand of the female protagonist.
There is a golden rule, turn off the dialogue, tell the story with visuals, and use details to persuade and shape the story; it seems that it has not been done.
Because, the character development, even if it is the change of the central character, no. But the line tells us: The lonely male protagonist has found a girl and a friend he likes, and thus feels the warmth of human affection? !
Isn’t that good, Harry Potter is a story about growing up...
Newt may be a cold and perverse geek, but he is not an idiot and a savage without common sense of life. It was ridiculous to smash so many stores. The screenwriter is too lazy, this kind of joke is terrible! ! !
The villain created by Colin Farrell, who has rejuvenated this time, is also terrible. Knowing how to act with eyebrows is a talent, but in order to appear deep, I don’t speak well, hesitating, exaggerating, and inexplicably paranoid; lines can’t be squeezed out like constipation... I really don’t understand the use of this kind of popular rejuvenation.
The heavy hardcover version of the setting collection is very popular, and the art setting is very clear. The character analysis can’t wait to write 20,000 characters, which is simply putting the cart before the horse. Buy cassava and return beads. It's bad.
Credence and the heroine have a forefront. At a moment when her life before her execution was so personally significant, this case appeared to the point of being far-fetched and not convincing.
The existence of graves has always been strange. If you understand his true character, I don't know if he can explain his rather sloppy behavior patterns. He is a member of Aoxx, sitting in a meeting behind the corner (pretty old-fashioned to show "This dark character is very strong and plan something silently"). In the human world, to enter the scene of the accident requires silent power but the way It is to win over a boy with obvious mental disorder and find a kid with magic(?).
The texture of the snake's movement is not good, and the special effects are not in place.
The sunlight of the African grassland style inside the box also exposed that the light level of the studio shot is not very good.
Finally, fan movies are a kind of movie genre that tests the creators' requirements of themselves.
Some creators are unwilling to have the original work, and insist on making some changes of their own. Some are quite silly.
Part of it is the excuse of being lazy, making movies for the purpose of expanding the audience, but not bothering to deal with the higher amount of information in the books. Finally, in turn, we also said that we only know the original work by looking at it.
If you say, it’s not a fan, it’s helpless not to like it, because many stalkers don’t understand and don’t have a magic complex; with my IQ guarantee, many stalkers can see it without background knowledge. At the same time, there are some in the world. There are many film and television works of intense film&television refenreces, even high school students who only read textbooks will find it interesting.
A digression, the tribute to God is not a guarantee of high quality at all. If the superficial film propaganda slogans are brainwashed, perhaps satisfaction and happiness will indeed be a bit more [Tan Shou].
Yes, the huge gap between commercial films and art films is getting bigger and bigger: it has developed the lazy appreciating habit of commercial film audiences; compared with TV series, TV shows, and books, the big screen of movies is more full of the least particular and most unrealistic The most popular medium for cultural consumer goods. Hey. . . . .
This calculation is not a complaint against fb. It's more like being fed up with the lazy content of these series of stories over the past few years.
Whenever this happens, I always wonder if the great filter of fermi paradox hasn’t arrived yet. We haven’t reached the stage when all the members are destroyed, so we are destined to be unable to wait for the visit of foreign civilizations and we can’t evolve to realize our existence. The truth of the universe at that moment.
View more about Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them reviews
