Liang Tang has a prominent position in the film industry. Years of struggle have won the reputation of "Hollywood Money Printing Machine", but its acting skills have not been affirmed. The academy awards were stingy, and over the years, only a few nominations were given, and finally he was fair. A common saying in acting is, "If you say you have it, you have it, you don't have it, and if you don't have it, you don't have it, and you don't have it." The handsome guy already has too much, why let him always get what he wants? It is such a complex of hatred of the rich, people just reluctant to give him a good and good evaluation. The soup is also generous, not short of money or fame, and still able to work hard and film continuously. This kind of almost crazy work enthusiasm is very admirable. Not everyone can comment on an academic work, but when it comes to acting, even illiterate gangsters can stand up and compare, and it is easier to criticize the handsome guy’s acting skills. Just as people use "very pornographic and violent" as a humorous label regardless of occasion, questioning handsome guys' acting skills has also become a habitual action without thinking about it. But, try to ask yourself, have you ever figured out his expressions and actions, have you analyzed his nominations? Or from another perspective, have you ever wondered why famous singers who sing casually on stage can be commended as strength, and novices who do so will be labeled as "out of tune"? Except for the moment when the helicopter propeller stops at the moment when the helicopter propeller is about to pierce Liangtang’s throat, IM 1 is just watching a new film for me to relive this old film. I don’t need to say more about the plot. After 12 years, I still feel like I can’t stop it. On the contrary, the costumes and makeup of the actors reveal the characteristics of the times. Individuals are very fragile in the face of fashion trends: time and space have changed to today, and ordinary people can be found on the streets in a well-dressed style. However, even a dozen years ago, even famous people such as Tom Cruise, such as Kristin Scott Thomas, still feel that there is A little rustic. So when you see Audrey Hepburn or Brigitte Lin’s pictures of decades ago, you have to admit that these people have some special genes. IM 2This is my least favorite part of the series. How should I put it, I should have supported the famous Wu Yusen, but his pigeons flying in the flames of war are really unstoppable. The film is still full of Xiaoli Feidao or Ximen blowing snow complexes. For example, near the end of the scene, the big villain X raises his gun at the back and aims at Tang. It is said that the soup is powerless, but he is always faster than others: kick After a series of guns, grasping, turning, and shooting, the enemy will be killed first. Such a typical Hong Kong police film scene shouldn't be done by Hollywood screenwriters, right? The plot of martial arts, the combination of the East and the West, is refreshing when done well, but not good at doing well. What should you say under such a result? Don't say anything and continue to the next step. I have reservations about the film "deliberately stigmatizing Chinese people". In today's Beijing or Shanghai, isn't it true that Chinese people with the same clothes and mental outlook as in the film can be seen everywhere? Of course, those guards who were pissed off by tennis balls flying in the air knew it was ABC. What impressed me most in the film was Philip Seymour Hoffman, the actor played by the villain Owen. The first time I saw him was playing an A film photographer in Boogie Nighst. At that time, I thought that people with such looks and bodies would not even have the chance to run superstars. Bar? Later, I saw that he was playing an arms dealer whose arm was knocked off by Bruce Willis in The Jackal. At that time, I thought, he was still playing tricks. But he won an Oscar by accident, and he did his part with the soup. I know how narrow I am. In this place of Hollywood, as long as you are talented and diligent, success will still take care of you. Maybe this is why the "American Dream" is so fascinating for so many people. Jackal played an arms dealer whose arm was knocked off by Bruce Willis, thinking at the time that he was really still playing tricks. But he won an Oscar by accident, and he did his part with the soup. I know how narrow I am. In this place of Hollywood, as long as you are talented and diligent, success will still take care of you. Maybe this is why the "American Dream" is so fascinating for so many people. Jackal played an arms dealer whose arm was knocked off by Bruce Willis, thinking at the time that he was really still playing tricks. But he won an Oscar by accident, and he did his part with the soup. I know how narrow I am. In this place of Hollywood, as long as you are talented and diligent, success will still take care of you. Maybe this is why the "American Dream" is so fascinating for so many people.
The 50-caliber heavy-duty sniper rifle was used lavishly in the film with four but only used for fire suppression. It is suspicion of abusing the heavens. People only rely on one in "The Jackal" The private goods made in the Czech Republic supported the entire movie; but think about the fact that the director passed the props of such a cow A without any muddle, but it made the film more bullish: hehe, what are these? Some of my pretty soup is unique! Sure enough, the comrades of the "Impossible Mission Group" are not vegetarians. In the following scenes, fresh houses emerge in an endless stream, making all the "fetishists" eyes angry and wishing to rush into the screen and The protagonist wastes taxpayers' money together! Of course, the style with the purpose of "fast" finally makes the story of the film look very compact; in fact, it is not just "compact", it simply makes the audience's nerves frantic. In particular, the interval between the second and third action scenes was very short. The audience thought they could breathe a sigh of relief, but the sudden explosion rekindled their senses. It can be seen that Yapolan has really used his "press box bottom" skills in TV directing. If only in terms of the intensity of "actions", this episode is undoubtedly the best in the series. Comrades who are simply good at this can be satisfied. Perhaps the assurance that Brother Atang made during the promotion was aimed at this point. It seems that through the demonstration of "Mission Impossible 3", the American television industry finally gave the film industry back some nourishment. In addition, the film also has strong TV characteristics in the use of some unexpected and transitional scenes. Since Yapolan can create multiple ups and downs in a TV series in less than an hour, it is naturally easy to play with one or two "turns and turns" in two hours. The turning point of the plot is not new for such an action movie. The first two episodes also have very clear bridges to create "accidents", but the first episode is mainly based on suspense settings, and the second episode is mainly through The details are rendered, but they are not as straightforward as the "turning" in this third episode. Audiences who have watched American TV series have a deep understanding. Their TV screenwriters seem to be the best at making "sudden attacks", and they have the spirit of "swearing words without surprises", which makes American TV series seem to be every episode. So "substantial", so "material." Now "Mission Impossible 3" will give people this feeling. Therefore, it seems to be said that "Mission Impossible 3" under the helm of Asia Poland is like an episode in an extended and enhanced version of a thrilling TV series, which fully demonstrates the "compact and beautiful" characteristics of the American TV series. From this point of view, a great contribution should be given to Asia Poland. However, everything has two sides, especially if one characteristic or a style is brought to the extreme, it will make people smell negative information. The "compact and good-looking" nature of TV is actually a double-edged sword for movies: while it enriches the "content" of the movie, it may also disrupt the inherent "glamour" of the movie. The glamour of a movie can be expressed in many ways, but at the most obvious point, it is the rhythm of the movie that the average audience feels the most. Movies should have a different rhythm feeling when gathered with TV. Relatively speaking, TV series is more of a fast food culture, which also attracts audiences. TV series will emphasize the effectiveness of every minute and every scene, and this kind of effectiveness is mainly aimed at the present moment. To put it bluntly, the TV must ensure that every scene as much as possible attracts the audience, otherwise it will lose the audience, because the latter can easily and directly...change channels. For movie audiences, generally speaking, those who have bought tickets will still sit down, unless they can't stand it. In this way, the film is more attracted by a "holistic" feeling, and it emphasizes a "layout" rather than a simple superposition of compact fragments. It's a pity that "Mission: Impossible 3" feels like a superposition of intense action after another. The excitement is stimulating, but it doesn't feel like a film with rhythmic beauty. Originally "suspension" is very suitable for creating a moderately tight rhythm, but the transitions in this film-as mentioned above-are too straightforward, so there is no room for exertion or imagination. It is like a beautiful woman with breast enhancement, tender waist, and beautiful buttocks. It is really a wave of waves, one part is beautiful, but there is no excess between them: the chest is directly connected to the waist, and the waist is directly piled on the hips...... This way There is no sense of beauty at all for his figure. In fact, a good movie also needs a continuous "curve" like a beautiful woman, so that it will have a fascinating charm. "Suspense" requires "management", a process of accumulation, induction and explosion. To give a result purely, it can only be called a "turn". It may have a simple dramatic effect, but it does not contribute to the rhythmic beauty of the film in any way. After watching this film, I can only say that it makes me miss the first episode even more. I miss the sexy and mysterious that is compiled with the proficient film language. Such "beauties" are elegant and provocative, and they are ecstasy. "Mission Impossible 3" is equivalent to "Little Sweet" Brittany, bringing The stimulus comes quickly and disappears quickly, and the degree of stimulus depends on the level of your impulse. However, the old man has practiced the "Jade Man Heart Sutra" for more than 80 years, so after all, this kind of goods will not make me fall in love, so I recommend it to the guys who just like to watch "big movies". It stands to reason that the elder brother soup is not too young, so how can you still have the same virtue as the boys less than twenty? I thought that after the second episode of blindly playing cool and delaying time, he would learn his lesson and shoot the film in a mature and sexy way. Unexpectedly, he still liked the stuff that blindly stimulated hormones. No wonder the media are quite worried about his future recently, because surveys show that female audiences' expectations for this third episode have dropped. Although Laotang played family cards and love cards in movies, the way he played cards was very formulaic, and it might add gimmicks when placed on TV. When placed in movies, there was only a glimpse of light and the feeling of itchiness. The way the director "fills in" the plot is so without gaps that the film becomes a plot and plot work completely, and even the character image is eclipsed. However, it is worth mentioning that "Mission Impossible 3" has regained the "team spirit" of the first episode at any rate, and is no longer a personal show of Liang Lao Tang. Especially MaggieQ's performance, at least exceeded my expectations, and it feels that her role is more than the legendary. With her super-bright looks and fluent English, she left a deep impression on the audience in the theater. Especially when she lifted up her skirt to take out the detonator, and said heartily, "What a pity it is a beautiful car", her expression is so cute, it's worth taking a look. With such a performance, I personally feel that she still has a promising future in Hollywood. As for the specific scenes in the film, it is difficult to reveal too much. I personally like the "Vatican" section because it is compact and ingenious, but also has a sense of rhythm. At the same time, the action type is more "artistic", which is close to the "Stealing Disc" section in the first episode. Of course, the overall sense of suspense is still very lacking. For example, "Toilet Substitution" is "a little bit insignificant" compared to the first episode of "Stealing Discs". In addition, I personally feel that such actions with "IQ" are the characteristics of the "professional spy team". Pretty Guy Soup is not Schwarzenegger, you should stick to your "brave, courageous and unrestrained" side. Unfortunately, the more the film goes to the back, the more it becomes physical work, and there are many tributes to "True Lies"; but even "True Lies" "True Lies", people are more mature than this film in terms of characterization and plot tension. From this point of view, the advantages and disadvantages of this film are equally obvious: it is more exciting than the first episode, but at the same time it loses the elegance and calmness that matches the character's temperament; it is more compact and true than the second episode, but... There is no "but", just look sharper than the second episode interesting. (By the way, it was a big failure to choose Tan Di Newton and starring in the second episode. Not only did he miss the call with Lao Tang, but the two looked out of tune together. Old Wu’s core was originally romantic. As a result, it is naturally not romantic anymore.) "Mission Impossible 3" does not have the aesthetic pursuit of the film as a whole, but fortunately, a single scene can still hold the ground.
View more about Mission: Impossible III reviews
