Although "Dances with Wolves" won the Oscar for Best Picture in 1991, it doesn't seem to have been rated particularly highly historically. At that time, Kevin Costner was only thirty-five years old, and it was quite honorable to have such a big deal and achievements in his hands, but half of it was also due to the theme, which fit the trend of Hollywood preferences and epic blockbusters in the 1990s. , the story is based on the bloody history of western development and national integration, and tells a story and theme that people are willing to pay attention to. The film is very funny! The previous award-winning westerns can be traced back to 1931's "Ambition", with a gap of 59 years, which shows that although westerns are myths in American movies, they have not been favored and affirmed by mainstream film culture. It can be unique in the history of film, relying entirely on the style and charm of this type of film itself.
The bloody and unpleasantness in the process of national integration is largely due to the human innate mentality of possessing and plundering survival resources, as well as the soft aggression of human nature brought about by the export of civilization!
This standard is suitable for white Americans and Indians, and it is also suitable for the Chinese dynasty. It has universal value.
Personally, I think "Dancing With Wolves" is okay, that is, it focuses on the details of the fusion process, and it will inevitably be a little verbose. For four hours, most people will probably find it annoying to watch.
Still think Kevin Costner is handsome in a white shirt and overalls! I don't know why, but I always feel that he always plays bad movies, and there is nothing that impresses me particularly deeply. As for acting, although I don't know how to do it, I also think he doesn't seem to be particularly good, but I like him.
View more about Dances with Wolves reviews
