Either more funny or more serious, but this movie seems to be going in a more mentally handicapped direction

Katelyn 2022-03-22 09:01:30

The original old film was actually made pretty well. It was 32 years ago in 1984, and now I think about it, the special effects are definitely a big production.

The stalk of the film is the way of science + funny + supernatural, in fact, it is not bad.

Today, we have an all-female class. There is a lot of controversy in the United States. After watching it, I feel even more disappointed.

As a male audience, the first is the issue of appearance. The appearance of the four females is not as good as the mentally retarded male front desk. It's weird, I've been wondering what's the point of switching to an all-girls class like this? To be honest, a white man and a black fat woman, a crazy woman and a middle-aged woman really don't make people feel attractive.

Then there is the issue of IQ. The original design should have a high IQ, and it should be funny. Four women with different personalities will play a wonderful show. The result is that the first and second females are often caught up in tedious dialogue that is neither funny nor meaningful. Actors feel like they are reading the script, and the audience feels so bored. And female geeks perform excessive force on madness, in fact, there is no high IQ performance. Black people seemed to be the kind of detective-type characters who were very familiar with New York history and everything, but they ended up being a loud old rude. To be honest, the protagonist is neither clear nor attractive. In fact, I feel like I want to replicate the relationship of "The Big Bang Theory", but it is really very dull.

Although I saw the old version of the foursome: Bill Murray, Dan Aykroyd, Ernie Hudson, Harold Ramis, who has died, and even the heroine Sigourney Weaver came, in fact It can only make people think of the glory of the year and lament the decline of this drama.

Then talk about the weak plot, there were ghosts, scientific ghost hunting, conspiracy, etc., plus the performance of the four-person group, the movie is still very attractive. To this day, movies focus on the interaction between people, feminism, silly jokes and intrigues without suspense, etc., it really feels bland. Originally, you could either go with a spooky conspiracy theory, and today you can even consider terrorists using ghosts to destroy New York to create a new 911 meme. Or go the action route with hot girls. Or go the full comedy route. It's better than such broken thoughts, the plot has no climax, no horror, no comedy, and no sci-fi... It really makes people feel....boring

In addition, the special effects that did not exceed the works of 1984 are actually really disappointing.

View more about Ghostbusters reviews

Extended Reading
  • Maynard 2022-04-21 09:01:38

    You have a car, you have a car, you all have a car

  • Margarita 2021-11-12 08:01:16

    I have to say that restarting is a decision with potential. But the result of the film did not achieve the desired effect. The director does not seem to care to please old fans, but this does not indicate the originality and subversiveness of the film. Instead, the film is trapped in the framework of the old version of creation and cannot stimulate creativity. There are serious problems with laughter and rhythm, and the all-female cast did not bring more highlights to the film. Even the gender issues that you want to express are more flat.

Ghostbusters quotes

  • [disassembling Rowan's device]

    Jillian Holtzmann: I would have used aluminum but I'm crazy.

  • [examining one of Rowan's devices]

    Abby Yates: I'm smelling both electrical discharge and isotopic decay.