been said by many to be over the top for 13 Oscar nominations in 1999, including Best Supporting Actress in a Leading Role. Noncommittal.
1. The discomfort of watching movies. My understanding is this: Inspiration is equally difficult to capture and present. Writers go to great lengths to find their muse, and directors go to great lengths to show what the muse means to the writer. Not to mention the love-hate family disputes in the play-in-play, or poetry. They said (well, I said it), you can read poetry, you can love, but it is impossible to express your feelings for this poem, for love Achieving the one in 100,000—beauty is difficult, love is difficult, the understanding itself is indescribable, and the tension formed in the heart is also self-evident.
It's sad that I can't appreciate the essence of it very well for the time being;
2. The heroine Viola appeared when she was watching the play in the theater, and she was fully engaged in the whole process of talking with Shakespeare in the poetic drama. Love - love is so blatantly sultry, ah, thanks for the Renaissance, for the awakening of man, for the golden apple of the chest, for the inspiration given by the passionate eyes! You are the muse, love itself is the muse, you are love!
Although the choice of the heroine has gone through twists and turns in person, the melancholy and amorous but firm eyes that are finally presented are very good. As for whether she can get the best actress that year because of this - she did anyway.
3. Baroque costumes, large Dutch stand-up collar, exaggerated and magnificent colors, and large flowers;
4. The romantic and touching sonnets;
5. Praise the drama again
View more about Shakespeare in Love reviews
