—————————————————————————————————
About the story hideaway, what I saw was Game of Thrones. The wolf said the tiger, hunting for pleasure, killing for power. It really slaps people in the face. The tiger said at first to drive away people and children, but later it was revealed that the purpose was to seize territory, and it was the famous trick. The bear part is even better, saving people first and then exchanging benefits. Mowgli was stung by a bee. He encouraged him and said, "Look, I have inspired your potential." It reminded me of the American team leader. Realistic but correct. The orangutan is worthy of being a primate, and it goes to the heart of the power struggle - controlling the fire is controlling the forest. The layers are clear, which is really nice.
Mowgli discards fire when fighting tigers, which is a kind of duel-like spirit. His ability to use tools as a man was once regarded as a forbidden technique in the jungle, just like animals view fire (power) - abuse is a disaster . The fact that Mowgli used the vines and dead trees to defeat the tiger, it was his human nature to win the duel (at the time he didn't understand fire, and he couldn't control it well, it was abusive). In fact, when the black panther saw him saving the baby elephant, the forbidden technique was unblocked, because he saw control, and breaking the law is a manifestation of the checks and balances of power.
Maybe I'm overinterpreting it, but that's even scarier. It shows that when American screenwriters create stories, the core is naturally formed. I have always had a feeling that the reason why a story is circulated is that it has vitality in itself. A story is valuable enough to present it, and the narrator does not have to introduce more of his own. Some stories even have extremely crooked views, and also have the vitality of circulation. They may be like evil forces, but there is a reason for them to survive.
————————————————————————————————————
View more about The Jungle Book reviews
