"Gladiator" interprets prison break movie version

Jordan 2022-03-22 09:01:31

Russell Crowe and Liam Neeson are just these two names, and I think they are enough chips to sell tickets. The two powerful veteran movie stars co-starred in this remake version of "Everything For Her" and performed the movie version of "Prison Break" together.
The police who suddenly visited the door completely shattered the originally peaceful life of a happy family. John, the male literature teacher played by Russell Crowe, was told that his wife had become a murderer out of nowhere, and the evidence was conclusive. There is hardly any room for defense. In this way, a housewife of a family of three was imprisoned on the charge of murder, and then repeated the above and lost the case again and again. At this time, the love and trust accumulated over the years between husband and wife played a crucial role, in all cases. The evidence is not in favor of his wife. When everyone thinks that she is guilty, and everyone has given up on her, the husband always believes that his wife is innocent, and he wants to save her from the high wall. Watching his wife wither away in prison and even attempted suicide, this gentle teacher who seemed to be helpless was finally forced to Liangshan and decided to take the risk to help his wife - escape from prison.
I believe that many people have watched the famous American drama "Prison Break", which set off a climax in the ratings many years ago. The technical content of prison break is still very high. The map of the entire prison and the pre-arranged plans are all transformed in the form of works of art. A tattoo, a leather map that looks gorgeous and cool, is definitely not something that ordinary people can complete, and the word pain alone is enough to discourage most people. So "Mi Shuai" has been arranged for so long, and soon after entering the prison, he will be able to get the boss in the prison, and then he starts to call the wind and call the rain. By the way, he makes a big hole in a concrete wall with an egg beater easily. In addition to bringing out his own brothers, he could also bring a few valetes along with him, and a group of people would form a group to escape from prison. As for the male protagonist in this film, a teacher is not so good, and there is not enough time for him to prepare. Suddenly, the news that his wife is about to be transferred makes the already tense time become Even more cramped, there were only three days left for him to implement the plan. It took three days to turn a teacher into a felon who escaped from prison, and three days to turn a warm-hearted family man into a dangerous person, a scheming husband who would do anything to save his wife, uh... ...and see how this story lives in vain.
Of course, there is no such thing as a successful benevolence. Since you have acted, you can only succeed in this way. The key is what the way and method of success are. The film gives a very detailed introduction, and the exciting step by step The implementation process is naturally very exciting, but I always doubt that the teacher protagonist has the possibility of this bunch of abilities. I think only the knowledgeable and the usual interests are more extensive. This statement is more reasonable.
While bringing a very exciting story, the director also questioned and discussed the existing system through the film, whether the situation encountered by the family like the male protagonist is real, and how to avoid such a situation. Recover? Does everyone who encounters such a situation have to consider jailbreaking? I think not everyone has the ability and persistence of the male protagonist, so what other methods are there? Worth thinking about.

View more about The Next Three Days reviews

Extended Reading

The Next Three Days quotes

  • [first lines]

    David: Please, get me to a hospital. I can't breathe. I...

  • Erit: Don't apologize, it's genetics. Women are always competing with each other. That's why you're having problems with your boss.

    Lara Brennan: Because she's a woman...

    Erit: Exactly. Women should work under men, men under women. That's it.

    John Brennan: What about men under men?

    Erit: That's fine too, I mean they can deal with it.