With this film, I try to analyze the difference between the gangster Gangster and the hooligan hooligan. Gangsters are after chaos; gangsters are after order. For gangsters, violence is the end; for gangsters, violence is only a means. Rogues only bully the weak, and gangsters only bite the hard bones. Rogues are short-sighted, gangsters are far-sighted. The hooligans are dodging, and the gang is upright. Rogues only rely on hormones, gangsters rely on IQ and EQ. Politicians scorn gangsters, and gangsters are the perfect complement. What hooligans pursue is self-recognition, and what gangsters pursue is value realization. Gangsters are impulsive, gangsters are calm. Rogue is empty, gangster is deep.
Rogues can have feelings, but they have no future. When a little hooligan grows up, he is a big hooligan, and when a big hooligan grows old, he is an old hooligan. Rogue stinks, is stinky rogue. A hooligan is a dead hooligan. Gangsters have much more prospects, they can be transformed into rich businessmen, they can become politicians, and they can guide the country. Politics is an explicit rule, and gangs are an implicit rule. The soft underbelly of politics is democracy, and it just so happens that violence and fear are the nemesis of democracy. This is also the point of convergence between the two. In short, gangsters are pushing history forward, and hooligans are just mindless moths in history.
View more about Legend reviews
