View more about Bridge of Spies reviews
Quite satisfactory, only one character's surprise
Marilyne 2022-03-21 09:01:23
When the final subtitles appeared, I realized that Spielberg is the one who still shoots the main theme movies so neatly and textbook-like. Can't fault it, but it's not interesting to watch now. The point is to show the big environment and the twists and turns of the espionage exchange. The story is very weak, almost imaginable content, and some interesting tricks are used to string each content together. The cast is eye-catching, but there are many gags, only Mark Rylance's arresting performance, although there are not many scenes, but it is definitely the most experienced, restrained, good-natured, and dedicated spy role.
Extended Reading
-
Reed 2021-10-20 19:02:28
It can only be said to be good-looking, Spielberg and Hanks have reached the age when they can no longer provide us with surprises. In addition, there are a few places in the Tucao that compare the two countries' interrogation and treatment of each other's spies, deliberately creating contrasts. 【AMC Santa Anita 16】
-
Novella 2022-03-19 09:01:03
Spielberg, "Bridge of Spy", Hollywood licensed, invisible, Spielberg is diligent and productive, but he is well-behaved, as he grows older, his imagination is weakened, and creative elements are reduced. The film is completely based on technical indicators and past experience. , Behind the so-called neat and accurate licensed goods, there is a kind of poverty and mediocrity and self-repetition, which is in a disguised form and is difficult to continue. In addition, the emotional strength is reluctant and it is a bit tasteless. You can only look at the actors.
-
James Donovan: It's my business, what-ifs. I'm in insurance.
-
Wolfgang Vogel: You should be careful. This is not Brooklyn, Mr. Donovan.