I am more surprised that the first 300 Warriors is actually a work in 2006. I remember that I only watched it two years ago.
The two works do not belong to the relationship between the prequel and the successor. In terms of the storyline, the plot of this one is at the same time point as the previous one, and the antecedents and part of the follow-up plot of the first one have been added. There is a third one. Intend.
The gore of this war movie is not the same as the shattered gore of a horror movie. But it is still the same heavy taste, and the audience who can't accept this aspect, naturally don't watch it.
With such a bloody level, it is natural to have a dew point. Female general, female villain, can also be regarded as the heroine, Lulu, Lude is not bad.
To briefly talk about the plot, the first part mainly said that the king of Sparta brought 300 dead soldiers to resist the Persian army, the wife at home was let on, and finally he and the 300 dead soldiers were all in the hands of the Persian king; the second part It is mainly said that the commander of Greece led the whole Greeks to rebel against Persia, then gave the female general of Persia, and finally killed her.
It's mainly about these two points, hehe, I don't know who gave whom to the third part...
View more about 300: Rise of an Empire reviews
